IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.

Ólafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Mon, 06 February 2017 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54146129EB5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:57:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.787
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.787 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.887, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tTRXX3i4UAbU for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:57:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp109.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp109.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B39E1129EB2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:57:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp22.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp22.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C09446938; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:57:28 -0500 (EST)
X-Auth-ID: ogud@ogud.com
Received: by smtp22.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id D461C67C7; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:57:17 -0500 (EST)
X-Sender-Id: ogud@ogud.com
Received: from [IPv6:2607:fb90:91e:147c:7a5e:1b92:696c:f8b3] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [172.56.21.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.7.12); Mon, 06 Feb 2017 10:57:28 -0500
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 09:57:15 -0600
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <6B4E9F56-1487-4E09-9245-167C4790AB3D@gmail.com>
References: <6391B5BB-19BD-4717-B9BB-ECD145F7B4F6@fugue.com> <20170206040516.1701.qmail@ary.lan> <CAPt1N1mbzhS19G_uDA8HokVxXuHy5uA7F1c84-1yUUpqZ2ifJQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1702052315130.13902@ary.qy> <CAPt1N1m2mowdCF6igU0TN-FCcjas9AaY-uGma4HgPGKx0Jg4Tw@mail.gmail.com> <4E481C14-1C2B-4A18-A4F2-582208C1DDE3@ogud.com> <6B4E9F56-1487-4E09-9245-167C4790AB3D@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----2DR8N0X9HD5PPO6C7WX0V4SNGLH6YA"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
From: Ólafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
Message-ID: <EFFF717C-3A5A-4877-8B40-2D5DF42FD19C@ogud.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Y_Gn-ht1EhqLvg_P377rJVbJdXY>
Cc: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dnsop@ietf.org, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 15:57:33 -0000

Ralph, 
A WG can come to a consensus on a topic without all information available.
Now go back and see if reality changes consensus.

Just my .02 cents.


Ólafur

On February 6, 2017 9:52:53 AM CST, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Feb 6, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Ólafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
>wrote:
>> 
>> Ted,
>> 
>> What RFC are you referring to?
>> 
>> Why do you think .ARPA is for services?
>> It's for infrastructure and homenet wants to join the infrastructure.
>> 
>> It is waste of time arguing if name A or B is better take the one you
>can get faster.
>
>The WG has considered the alternatives, and WG consensus is to specify
>".homenet"
>
>- Ralph
>
>> 
>> Ólafur
>> 
>> 
>>> On February 5, 2017 10:22:35 PM CST, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
>wrote:
>>> The working group has consensus to give it a try.  We may change our
>minds of it takes too long, but it seems worth exploring from a process
>perspective anyway. 
>>> 
>>> On Feb 5, 2017 11:18 PM, "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>>>>> I'm pretty sure I've explained it enough times on this mailing
>list and in
>>>>> the relevant documents by now. If you don't agree, maybe we should
>just
>>>>> accept that. If you don't remember the explanation, it's in the
>homenet
>>>>> naming architecture doc I wrote.
>>>> 
>>>> Well, OK, I took another look, and from what I can see, it's a
>belief that people will find toaster.homenet.arpa harder or more
>confusing to type than toaster.homenet.
>>>> 
>>>> Just out of curiosity, how long is it worth waiting to get .homenet
>rather than .homenet.arpa?  If it took five more years, which at the
>current rate seems optimistic, would homenet still be relevant?
>>>> 
>>>> R's,
>>>> John
>> 
>> -- 
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status