IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Validating responses when following unsigned CNAME chains...

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 30 April 2020 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0883A0C03 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V4YSBrDt7TJR for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC8123A0C01 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id n143so6339750qkn.8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=2UcBXbu+MUEa8rnxSYcOAei74BiAW3hRT3oED5uVe24=; b=JY2jW6OezNoRo/zWAlApwEDFJBjBcIGZ/kYupU7ZdetPuVLw0wGs6Ba5pYmzdiVN83 To5VUYUZC6Voih0a1Bb5fqp+4bI5av9QOlwmtfVPS1jdMarIXIqrKNiM3+mgj9ISCq9u QnQDF4TZ5irI3SKb0xzzHI7/awb+aBiJszXedEy9RZfXYTNPolCsa+nyr+1O4F82kwje ZD5kWIW6/QZLAZQbQDWe0pqFyDbJLXt6zt2PlFxTw6+vXyFot/xgDauYJDc0/8H8lGwd qjA3su4Ia8l1rrfiSPv5y1rlQThZH6ICA3mBopeHYrWOREm9GvDhOTxDfxZz6Wb0EjQc r4QA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=2UcBXbu+MUEa8rnxSYcOAei74BiAW3hRT3oED5uVe24=; b=b6cspJC1sBxsbDVgFWJj1WRdj0+OGIkDt1Q+4+PoC9GXpMSlRe5atA3kQsa7DJ0hkb xgEj8AV53FQUZGY/E4x0btM0BK9EoTBWrSy8cPK68+O96WNChO43aVQZBxIX6Jh+Qmh7 GuPpejNv/k+EHcyf8R59pTmPC8aawdXFyjV7RS9Mz/A3V+xaajR4nXcer4u01yw44aNM YoYPr1k/nf8jB0Q9Z80JIe4AgsuIFCP3zcQcytJFK18tygJtZwxKlSn3NYWu4nXQjbNY VkjI1ezZtCLq3M3M1N99+0z229EMR3gNfVwmP4etSZ2wR8K9eK1boueFPec1McU9xkRz wfIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubrpDVJt2e3anCXjwayuFqtmj05HGvKS0rQG9U+UIFHU5/SXFyz fMUFYcHObJ8Dx9yDyPxbqlbZMQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIcLJqrsOoquqoRUKx7cTBG00vhgbyPdMzCrNLwGEWJ+C44A93GeU2nZY0w556X7LHW6oDXOw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:22ab:: with SMTP id p11mr4548939qkh.373.1588264456414; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:e518:6559:325d:1a5f? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:e518:6559:325d:1a5f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l8sm99503qtl.86.2020.04.30.09.34.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <B7CE1DAE-62D5-42B6-BAAB-1508F2873C86@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_08F06C05-31E9-4141-84AF-92CB1071A3EA"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3636.0.1\))
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:34:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <26C19769-CB12-4FFE-802E-32FDC582364B@opendns.com>
Cc: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
To: Brian Somers <bsomers@opendns.com>
References: <1EA6A13C-6E60-4ED9-9A50-E33D9D17504C@fugue.com> <129b0546-0123-30e0-cfca-8a66721ab046@nthpermutation.com> <CAHPuVdU0BkdWszQs0cAE0N2AA9cqJfO=aA70GsmyWw7Hzeb6Cw@mail.gmail.com> <58C18901-494E-4C2C-9C0D-746D9B08FA5A@opendns.com> <B5B438D8-D3A7-41B2-859F-AC7A94031135@fugue.com> <26C19769-CB12-4FFE-802E-32FDC582364B@opendns.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3636.0.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YeWBlyMJWCjlFHL_AbYJvrfhtSc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Validating responses when following unsigned CNAME chains...
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:34:24 -0000

On Apr 30, 2020, at 12:00 PM, Brian Somers <bsomers@opendns.com> wrote:
> I would say RFC 4035 sections 4.2 and 4.3 say this.  Section 5.5 re-iterates that
> SERVFAIL should be sent if signatures don’t validate.

Yes, now that I read it with that in mind I see that you are correct. Thanks!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email