IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP]Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-05.txt

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Wed, 08 May 2024 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03B9C14F6B1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2024 07:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id znoJQmaMrOX9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2024 07:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1DD0C14F617 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2024 07:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF921A432 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2024 10:36:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h= mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject :to:cc:content-type; s=sasl; bh=YZtIUVjkAYc/mBLdRVfPTOF8StaHDreR Q6alBibjwOU=; b=KWodeCHRMWsyAfrx3xDGzXOo5Fn+ce7cc1tlNn7njyHtrJTH nxqv2q7upoFpAQUFRuVwwpHMxLPV1AkzydoYfCS3/ttz7WsDkfmMfgcqg6NfPWds RoueXXXfTLTXGlhA5PuZPcWH3ABQe4CtGx2k8tpcINR6ML4/EVIGVs3A/rE=
Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B621A431 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2024 10:36:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: from mail-lf1-f42.google.com (unknown [209.85.167.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9323E1A42E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2024 10:36:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: by mail-lf1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-52006fbae67so6060136e87.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 May 2024 07:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy/iYSZNkwMNJMjjOMYyDiSUHTKpF5+4loSruT2lY8u3qR/sCJD 5LUGwOhbENrh8IxOtFzdsDOYZdeSTy6GZpfoBy+uNpo7L7jc3tjErV9bZYnrfKgvFpEuVU6JYMN IanQhXNxEOhJdt4urytyyXVROsfg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGhP81XEzjVpK1kr9Cnhdyc7YPAFeE3U5nH3dZRhtoCUstFpae4pWf4uCXb3/sShwSbVDuNRF51gQCDei46mGI=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5e2d:0:b0:51f:4c53:8e4c with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5217c7605c1mr1521455e87.33.1715178987003; Wed, 08 May 2024 07:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <171445742036.49563.13324170881185978217@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAD9w2qbdZvnLTW57nYToEBumS7aFVjbT=ii5QLwPsRH2d_ER4A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD9w2qbdZvnLTW57nYToEBumS7aFVjbT=ii5QLwPsRH2d_ER4A@mail.gmail.com>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 07:36:16 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VFSxPqiT4w_a-vA9410maMOY6kroT_m+yuyDijdQS-+cg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VFSxPqiT4w_a-vA9410maMOY6kroT_m+yuyDijdQS-+cg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Momoka Yamamoto <momoka.my6@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003f33300617f23a7f"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5B87A22A-0D48-11EF-BEDA-A19503B9AAD1-06080547!pb-smtp21.pobox.com
Message-ID-Hash: ZCRSPBVT5IRQXZ37JBANROIMEXKRS3AA
X-Message-ID-Hash: ZCRSPBVT5IRQXZ37JBANROIMEXKRS3AA
X-MailFrom: heard@pobox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP]Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-05.txt
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YfRICDyp4K7a_HCewWs5wauHMQo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

Greetings,

There seems to be a mismatch between the document's intended status of
Informational and the statement in the Abstract that it "documents Best
Current Practice". I note that RFC 3901 in fact was a BCP.

Mike Heard

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status