Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00.txt

[Normen Kowalewski <[e-mail]>]

Paul, Lada,


On the comment for the wording in the line after the example in  3 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00#section-3>. YANG Design Considerations
     typedef dns-class-name {
       type enumeration {
         enum IN {
           value 1;
           description
             "Internet (IN)";
           reference
             "RFC 1035 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1035>";
         }
         ...
       }
     }

   The other type, "rr-type-name", is exactly analogical.

Maybe we could use the wording 

   The definitions for the other basic type, "rr-type-name” are derived in analogy to this structure, except that the IANA registry "Resource Record (RR) TYPEs” is the respective underlying data source.

BR, Normen


>> 	The other type, "rr-type-name", is exactly analogical.
>> 
>> I'm not sure if "analogical" is a common word to use and might be a bit
>> confusing to non-native speakers like me. I'm also confused about
>> "exactly analogical". What would inexactly analogical be? :)
> 
> Being another non-native speaker, I am open to suggestions