Re: [DNSOP] implementations of CSYNC?

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 14 June 2018 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99B6130F08 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kB4IOjO8Dq88 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAB2D130EEF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C03221515; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1803281647250.10477@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:29:59 -0700
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1803281647250.10477@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> (Tony Finch's message of "Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:48:35 +0100")
Message-ID: <yblfu1pi01k.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Yqv0rKLx3k3wJjHweYq-TkzRofA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] implementations of CSYNC?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 20:30:01 -0000

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> writes:

> Related to the current discussion, does anyone have any links to
> implementations of CSYNC?

Tony,

As the RFC author I don't know of any.  Interestingly, I was just
thinking about diving into an implementation when I get a bit more time
(I'm swamped at the moment), but I have more time than I did a year ago
so the trend is right...
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI