IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Requesting WGLC of draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors.

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Thu, 23 April 2015 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CD51A8938 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ORBiL30JJmdS for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 205801A8963 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wiun10 with SMTP id n10so432572wiu.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5p7ftYk5ugdiQLUyuTkAZLvM+qQzKhtFcMlH8utWMkQ=; b=loxRg63oFuXxkO0t++ry9e7PksM7523vb9lg+R73ONCM4L+82k3JfKHRaG/5NwMgIL vsbttGUhfdrSgyOor7RH06ig9SYIKvv+d3+Bz5BR64GiDvJK7uzsXx54OdPCT23q096O 9dIXjUyxO41cCl9MIfRRXXWZH5hujsbUGeXDNqDWQ2UZl2uuh5VnbwmXfDSGMP9uvHAj WrgeJFH9oO2i0v2dRfZj7rjvHFmurGCxG0WCKgAv6pkLsNKJHXICTSIh4GgYmrV39qlX PokrjovAX2e4lcWoNMMo4iQdLX3T9pf/ktYCyEAgOtFfWjEetT3hgIrvPdAVY7201IgA FMuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk15gOgeFVXxw5IqcTPfF/E5RYnFreHGGQ40WM3oil7kOUAIYVvX2HV9lvaC32qOJV1VvFs
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.104.201 with SMTP id gg9mr9294068wjb.113.1429825756834; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.47.36 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqd3ka81dKhV=zF9VN9hMizgmt7N8wJZjbL+MkxFeK+jVg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJMtT4rgy-K4Px0bud0f1D0kmvFNZxa-9tuQRuTTZKUJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqd3ka81dKhV=zF9VN9hMizgmt7N8wJZjbL+MkxFeK+jVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:49:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJ0noMZsxCO4ZypSq1pRgW_A8c2aNfEAY3hvn-k2HOw-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ZCWopXiLFtHlavp5lwRyOkMZV-8>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, "dnsop-chairs@ietf.org" <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Requesting WGLC of draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 21:49:34 -0000

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:06 PM, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> wrote:
> At Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:39:26 -0400,
> Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>
>> We believe that "Definition and Use of DNSSEC Negative Trust Anchors"
>> ( draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors  -
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors/
>> )  is ready for WGLC.
>>
>> We believe we have incorporated all comments

Doh!
Apologies, I thought that one of the other authors had incorporated
all comments up till end  of 2014.


>> , and that the document
>> has received significant review.
>
> Just for a quick check: I've made some comments on an earlier version
> of the draft:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg12614.html
>

I will address these immediately.


> and, as far as I remember I've not seen any response to it.  I'm
> lazily skipping to check if they are somehow addressed in the latest
> version right now - please kindly and simply say so if that's the
> case.  It would also be appreciated if I missed any response to the
> comments or my comments were just silently dismissed.
>

Silently *missed*, not silently dismissed.

Apologies again, will fix.
W

> --
> JINMEI, Tatuya



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email