IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Current DNS standards, drafts & charter

Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com> Sat, 31 March 2018 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <matt@conundrum.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFFA1241F3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gzVYAAzHf3fY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com (mail-it0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83736120725 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id 71-v6so12760287ith.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=C1wHb5x88sdVew26ZTglmB5bIrcPZyD0zTBas4FccQE=; b=mR7BOIYGNSI4+vFkq2odfAH83pLv8JGUUDSrNE0mQprmfhJ1WiDCD8N4nN7GhTS2OB Vs/h/vBctjAJw7rsiesxCahsg0Luzc+PaK+5xlw5d+zMBj2b4ghqZP0tRa85dp3UUJyI Zd3+n5qFdJV1ppPC+LiG0EJ26y4aG0kZFW1PJL8SKOKXNOOj+Qlp6HbEE3YvaYmL60G9 u/F1Att8ENFVl0pDMyEZhzoQ4TRAkqUMZ6GDS4tEimun/HdYZU6Q6TICAq8dr34UFo43 W/abiqRp3mWrASPKyqg3xeMeB2l+ieNQNYHblZ+1gLdHK0mbnRkoDZ4Z49zhqmoNaotr VRVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=C1wHb5x88sdVew26ZTglmB5bIrcPZyD0zTBas4FccQE=; b=kRFbIETLo7jJLFMMVS+HbBVH1zhGhpGDRLu66m9scz8NKcF6kDtvIjCkni92Qy+r4H wXFM1+GBJRIF5nM5WkmAR5YdpFaxlYLnrXEPGHXUjl6siQoQXy3q8QH/MmvF7UwR6iG4 sYEsEQ4nIGb88/2zpvE1rEx2c4QDtjurzvp2ngu29cmW672vg0iZ3SsJDVyos1CKTwag YbbuB0UxzGO8U2En3v4q6BoJDXB4UtleOmZOlkumXP9FBI9xxV2BDBfMni6vJyBibWEW bxotYw7FCqXOaGTEZrZSz09odDQzK1d0paHsPJ8pPaY7LzVmC5sOL+819cgQ2O0eysCX +bcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7Ht3mNABmyZSgk3fWpDAvWdqLpPY0YGErBYCd5MuxlYmYNG7JnI LziGRKjJf3e1/y0u0a10pqliIO2rExi+Jj5wc0ZgCw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48Dt49jiA7jKEsUs1DFn27zeCq12xkQRkq+cNsvOb0fMktinZTk3+CpENwbPvoKHvbO9QkJw3gbmYaeJWCCaio=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:c301:: with SMTP id s1-v6mr8243531itg.100.1522531213746; Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.112.197 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5ABBE389.5020008@redbarn.org>
References: <20180326154645.GB24771@server.ds9a.nl> <CA3D81B6-164F-4607-A7E6-B999B90C4DA8@gmail.com> <5852643C-B414-4C3E-A1B9-553054D3DD46@isc.org> <CAAiTEH8aA3J1j4iUQDisDHiUJXopykKkssuhOK=v+iVV_XZWyA@mail.gmail.com> <5ABAB891.3010306@redbarn.org> <CAAiTEH94S9VE0_QNEmUvVEkvxtBi2hoWo3DUVENJbEiXM+kkHw@mail.gmail.com> <5ABADEFE.30806@redbarn.org> <CAAiTEH9=rmhmRqCQyEbBFKF3BgKbe8bx+G3eAqhdqKEC55eA4A@mail.gmail.com> <5ABBE389.5020008@redbarn.org>
From: Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 17:20:13 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAiTEH8bLcvfnhB3=Hzds=q8ppMQOZw6vXY7h3CO-MdYW3BFCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Cc: Ondřej Surý <ondrej@isc.org>, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000027ba460568bbec95"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ZTfoi5liOVUuQbo4Ghu9D20Yb9U>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Current DNS standards, drafts & charter
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 21:20:16 -0000

On 28 March 2018 at 14:48, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote:

> matt, the rfc document set is innately time-series. this was seen as a
> strength compared to some "document set in the sky" that would be updated
> periodically with lineouts and additions, like for example legal codes or
> the ARIN PPML. i think you're very close to saying we need the latter in
> addition to the former, and if so, then i agree with you, but this is an
> IETF problem not a DNSOP problem. --paul
>

I think the RFC series as a whole needs to contain both, but I'm not saying
that both should exist simultaneously for any given set of documents within
the RFC series.  I think we've reached a point where the time series for
DNS has become so complex and convoluted that it's time for a reset to make
it readable again.  We can then carry on patching that with time-series
documents if we want, but the rewrite will give us a new baseline that's
coherent and complete, which we don't have today.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email