Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-10.txt> (DNS Stateful Operations) to Proposed Standard

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Tue, 12 June 2018 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB86130E06 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AaCHjdiJdDrT for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (amt0.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97C30130E40 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.10.126] (unknown [107.13.237.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5387D4CD; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:22:10 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACWOCC_rdGMMqx_LZq+i9M1sJFYiV1wTURgKL74c6OEHjN-8=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:22:57 -0400
Cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6EF3B6E9-F271-4833-8B36-BCEF36FAF910@bangj.com>
References: <152873404868.2868.3475438265820373869.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CACWOCC_xzMt_y=vU1TukvetU+Ra3ei+k90Ed1q8tyNpeJCYLCA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=H6fa=sj03Y=8Ma7K0wZ5s=NiSA+KyhZcLUQPAzinsEg@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC_rdGMMqx_LZq+i9M1sJFYiV1wTURgKL74c6OEHjN-8=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ZUmZsf3ktIx7ZnU7ctLrizAy-us>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-10.txt> (DNS Stateful Operations) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:23:04 -0000


> On Jun 12, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> wrote:
> 
> Dear Ted,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>> Yes.   I'm using it right now to implement draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-relay, and
>> that implementation is working and interoperating.   I don't know of another
>> independent implementation yet, unfortunately.
> 
> Can you elaborate a bit more? What is the name of the implementation?
> This is an implementation in progress? I don't fully understand how
> there can be interoperating if there is no other implementation.
> 
> I see roughly 150 (!) BCP14  keywords in this draft. Can you specify
> for your implementation for each of these normative keywords whether
> your implementation is complaint, or not, and if not why not?
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Job

I did an initial implementation of a client and server for DNS push notifications which is based on Stateful Operations. This code isn’t public and I haven’t looked at it for about 6 months. But it did identify some issues early on in the draft that we corrected for.

Thanks,
Tom