Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records-01.txt

Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> Mon, 13 May 2019 08:00 UTC

Return-Path: <each@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DE912003F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 01:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YIJJoqo0mtPY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 01:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5101112002E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 01:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [149.20.48.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E2183AB03E; Mon, 13 May 2019 08:00:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id A9D2E216C3B; Mon, 13 May 2019 08:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 08:00:19 +0000
From: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: =?utf-8?B?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?= <ondrej@isc.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190513080019.GB28485@isc.org>
References: <155771990790.31813.2767356343632633845.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7023B4C5-5207-4183-A945-244E65F00302@isc.org> <1A7FE19D-E4B1-48FB-8225-DCD055E4FDCD@icann.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1A7FE19D-E4B1-48FB-8225-DCD055E4FDCD@icann.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ZZCKDYn3R3v4UVQHAg0MnJwfFSc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 08:00:22 -0000

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 07:47:35AM +0000, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> A far easier approach is for any developer to feel free to treat these
> RRtypes as unknown RRtypes.

I'm not sure I understand the distinction you're making here?
What you said sounds similar to what the document proposes, so
perhaps the document is unclear, or perhaps I've misunderstood you.

-- 
Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.