IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com> Wed, 21 December 2016 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146F912955A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:36:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iFRljbCqDgdl for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:36:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22f.google.com (mail-io0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F7C91296A4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:36:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id m133so22254615iom.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:36:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iJv+Pw4JNvNR3642RebEMGpHBN4Ij1FI5LGdunj3wK0=; b=EOP9R7iDwV1hF4byWP6aBjasRaLN7r2kJ46WH5SsANUE92zOmxX+E2eJLsPsyhX8aE kC8LIDrdIBsqywX1Z4pEDsl0k7WWCiJDNhWrXrirN3wDMDLe9fkqBtyzPNmNsL7fnUam i9EhkEB61S5SufnPAZM+LQsiW9yJFZouHnL4B8BFCN9jazWiD4Y0zVXjvj78ZOBiHhqj 8+k1O2joGcBVGYp07M57UX9cINgsne2aNdQxDnVRvkm0dmtvxKw9d/5bOD8vjnYmaypb YWMAifDElcjJqxci2y8zd2euEG6Xdw9Th4wKXXp9EBns2lFxUOlLKmKEhMHbYy+n59Hi hHsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iJv+Pw4JNvNR3642RebEMGpHBN4Ij1FI5LGdunj3wK0=; b=UrmeHnjacXqjsxciQEgPLwacQjeWor1IoR87agw6bzoqDa1sJvi2bTe6vumcfVc7Qf V9GkjKnleUjTG02vJQg7y3gdkuTRNnDo0atQOpnbD8bdZ6Vn0/NFPHLEWqoaT6htOOdn skXbG55jtgFTdBI2t2g9aP6NTDvsns/Gne49UpFC3D3Ea0Roa3RmyYcvyWGKA0ZhD5Sm yGsfTUZFtDov5W54GOuTGgg4Ci38e+8qz4Mo4ksLud3k8tDZeDktr2Efl4L5NKafPpvE Lesjaj9oLYJ/eKU8v/udiaHvwGCMro9yDPUb185dGlGXEyFapIdIkL3xMY0XNhstU8ol hZsQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJYoQLqk1aLsrJ0/jL3EDoRvLS1Gj/WCJxpJijCeCzViZKiw7+bW8lYZwCFxvmS5Sq0YUPudG2YGZN4qg==
X-Received: by 10.107.154.14 with SMTP id c14mr5605738ioe.0.1482330976710; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:36:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.159.137 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:36:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5248A099-7E1F-437A-A1B7-C300F917D273@fl1ger.de>
References: <CADyWQ+ETSd199ok0fgh=PB=--hW7buPgSoCg22aK51Bk4xxBmw@mail.gmail.com> <C18E2D4E-EE89-4AF6-B4A0-FAD1A7A01B5E@vpnc.org> <5248A099-7E1F-437A-A1B7-C300F917D273@fl1ger.de>
From: william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:36:16 -0800
Message-ID: <CACfw2hj4VfuqsM-jRpxNc+bWNsUcSid+Y=r9U5jsA-0ZLbLRUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140fc0c4e789105442c13d2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ZaOZSX_OqxYMvW0-GhXyvBuxoT0>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:36:19 -0000

the complaints about operator participation in the IETF go back decades.
 no news there.
in fact, there are operator driven fora for just such activities, DNS-OARC
comes to mind.
this draft actively destroys trust in the DNS, which reduces trust in the
Internet overall.
is that really what you want out of the IETF?

/Wm

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de> wrote:

> Moin!
>
> On 20 Dec 2016, at 17:33, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
> On 20 Dec 2016, at 7:16, tjw ietf wrote:
>>
>> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
>>> by
>>> DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>>>
>>
>> The draft itself is really not suitable for adoption by the WG. Just
>> slapping "Informational" on the document is insufficient for preventing a
>> lot of wasted effort by the WG in removing the parts of the document that
>> promote the practices described.
>>
> Other then in section 1, I didn't see this. However your response is yet
> another
> examples why we don't have operator participation in the IETF though we
> always
> say that we want it.
>
> I've talked to lots of operators of recursive DNS servers and nearly all
> of them
> have some form of DNS blocking/redirection, yet whenever this comes up in
> the
> IETF sometimes even from operators (draft-livingood-dns-redirect) we look
> the
> other way and say this does/should not exist.
>
> Well it does and if the IETF wants to be relevant to those operators it
> would be
> good if we had documents describing this, so they could be used as
> guidelines.
>
> And while I don't like yet another draft that encodes something in DNS
> data that
> was not meant to be DNS data I have to agree that this draft is relevant to
> this working group and given that we have already multiple implementations
> of
> it I think that the draft is something the working group should adopt.
>
> So long
> -Ralf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status