[DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8906 (6783)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 14 December 2021 08:28 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083463A08B2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:28:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21d40KDL9sA9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:28:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A76C3A08B7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:28:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id E3558EEA0C; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:28:46 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: muks@mukund.org, marka@isc.org, ray@isc.org, dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20211214082846.E3558EEA0C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:28:46 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ZnLca2Ne71z_99uHYjxSvNTisR0>
Subject: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8906 (6783)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:28:53 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8906,
"A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers: Failure to Communicate".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6783

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@mukund.org>

Section: 8.2.3

Original Text
-------------
as unknown EDNS options are supposed to be ignored by the
   server (Section 6.1.1 of [RFC6891]).


Corrected Text
--------------
as unknown EDNS options are supposed to be ignored by the
   server (Section 6.1.2 of [RFC6891]).


Notes
-----
Reference to the section in RFC 6891 is incorrect. There's no information on what to do with unknown options in RFC 6891 section 6.1.1.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8906 (draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-23)
--------------------------------------
Title               : A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers: Failure to Communicate
Publication Date    : September 2020
Author(s)           : M. Andrews, R. Bellis
Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Source              : Domain Name System Operations
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG