Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_C0BD357D-E30E-43E4-B8D1-79E0066AE0B0"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <61AE518D-10D7-42BF-89BE-15FB5DC1EE75@nic.br>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 23:03:41 -0400
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <BEC44DF6-EB2D-4421-BAA2-B87942E320A5@gmail.com>
References: <61AE518D-10D7-42BF-89BE-15FB5DC1EE75@nic.br>
To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Zo4sxIYziuu3nQc4g8H2e3OmbeY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ICANN Name collision framework
Precedence: list


--Apple-Mail=_C0BD357D-E30E-43E4-B8D1-79E0066AE0B0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252

Hi,


On Aug 19, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br> wrote:

> (Sorry if you have received more than 1 copy of this e-mail, since =
this is being sent to technical mailing lists focusing on DNS)
>=20
> There is ongoing policy development effort within ICANN towards =
subsequent procedures of new gTLDs releases; during the last round in =
2012, one of the last pieces of the program to be defined was the name =
collision framework, detailed at =
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/name-collision-2013-12-06-en .=20
>=20
> The current thinking is to keep most of the framework as it was in =
that round, with minor changes for low risk strings and some more detail =
for other strings. The base principle is to use research-accessible =
trusted databases such as DITL and ORDINAL to make decisions.=20

It's very good to see this outreach regarding the ICANN gTLD policy =
process, and this specific topic may well be of interest to DNSOP =
participants.

However, it's also not a core topic for this group, and is likely to be =
of interest to others as well.  Is there a dedicated mailing list, wiki, =
or other venue for people to offer their comments or continue the =
discussion?

There is a reference in the text to "the WG" ("Some of the questions =
still to be answered by the WG include=85") Could you expand the =
reference? Where can an interested DNSOP participant go to find out more =
about this WG and its work to date?


thanks,
Suzanne



--Apple-Mail=_C0BD357D-E30E-43E4-B8D1-79E0066AE0B0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=windows-1252

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Dwindows-1252"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; =
">Hi,<div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On Aug 19, 2017, at 11:47 AM, =
Rubens Kuhl &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rubensk@nic.br">rubensk@nic.br</a>&gt; =
wrote:</div><br class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Dutf-8"><div style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: =
space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=3D""><div =
style=3D"margin: 0px; line-height: normal;" class=3D"">(Sorry if you =
have received more than 1 copy of this e-mail, since this is being sent =
to technical mailing lists focusing on DNS)</div><div style=3D"margin: =
0px; line-height: normal; min-height: 14px;" class=3D""><br =
class=3D""></div><div style=3D"margin: 0px; line-height: normal;" =
class=3D"">There is ongoing policy development effort within ICANN =
towards subsequent procedures of new gTLDs releases; during the last =
round in 2012, one of the last pieces of the program to be defined was =
the name collision framework, detailed at <a =
href=3D"https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/name-collision-2013-12-06-en=
" =
class=3D"">https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/name-collision-2013-12-06=
-en</a> .&nbsp;</div><div style=3D"margin: 0px; line-height: normal; =
min-height: 14px;" class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div style=3D"margin: =
0px; line-height: normal;" class=3D"">The current thinking is to keep =
most of the framework as it was in that round, with minor changes for =
low risk strings and some more detail for other strings. The base =
principle is to use research-accessible trusted databases such as DITL =
and ORDINAL to make =
decisions.&nbsp;</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div><div>It's very =
good to see this outreach regarding the ICANN gTLD policy process, and =
this specific topic may well be of interest to DNSOP =
participants.</div><div><br></div><div>However, it's also not a core =
topic for this group, and is likely to be of interest to others as well. =
&nbsp;Is there a dedicated mailing list, wiki, or other venue for people =
to offer their comments or continue the =
discussion?</div><div><br></div><div>There is a reference in the text to =
"the WG" ("Some of the questions still to be answered by the WG =
include=85") Could you expand the reference? Where can an interested =
DNSOP participant go to find out more about this WG and its work to =
date?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>thanks,</div><div>Suzanne</d=
iv><div><br></div><div><br></div></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail=_C0BD357D-E30E-43E4-B8D1-79E0066AE0B0--