IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] A conversational description of sentinel.

Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> Wed, 07 February 2018 11:13 UTC

Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3DF126C0F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 03:13:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zt31Lg_n9mOC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 03:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (open.nlnetlabs.nl [185.49.140.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9A29124235 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 03:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hydrogen.nlnetlabs.nl (unknown [IPv6:2a04:b900:0:1:b832:6c5d:bdf2:6777]) by dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D5C1819F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:13:53 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; dmarc=none header.from=NLnetLabs.nl
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1518002033; bh=nGIRxxn+LwOhjwEmQD2E0nEzZn/exdUugonMVxibZpw=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=TWE38mXju4AwY1n/9ZLMQrCmBfFKw1OQBeANvJs1eTSH5VC2jy26MUMAnBGFsJ2SG 6wJcnk9N9yQuTw02DQLu0nqkVbYvkvZqpwns3Me5LaLyl7wYVlGQmhxb9rkNQeqPd1 QVpWXkz03JnadIpM2QMFb7auS1jfD+4ffRFVMwxU=
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CAHw9_iKnD4WtTKyof=nm4ChmDZ5mAPqA7a_-m1t_Lauugf4Uow@mail.gmail.com> <e8ac7bd0-26e6-cf97-e2ef-0ead50dc18ce@nic.cz> <88E7D27C-048E-44CB-B317-C892EA603D31@isc.org> <0c2a4a38-49d7-2b46-1ac8-1dda0812e217@nic.cz> <CAHw9_iJ6yL12OaGW5+fm8M3YUkrj46CvC2-ob7Xrc5HEaA_Z1Q@mail.gmail.com> <f9861a96-a930-bd08-7cf5-5c6b003f706e@nic.cz> <24C74B01-FC08-41CD-BB16-FD122F9EB61A@apnic.net> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1802051246230.30577@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <FDFE42D8-B805-4336-A9A5-B81F416B3251@apnic.net> <D07FE583-06F7-436D-97EF-4747B815AD3F@vpnc.org> <20180206094215.Horde.m4xt1lsOwvQ28hAbN1r_Tg4@andreasschulze.de> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1802061221510.30577@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <2ffeba22-5cf1-4eb0-b45c-fefb7cf1d8f7@nic.cz> <CBB24E6D-D20D-42CC-95D3-82A37C26BC31@vpnc.org> <fdbd881c-d778-cd0f-a002-f1dd441f519b@nic.cz> <CAHw9_iJXeRXkG8Mr_YuSkVV5HuSWNgRo5x=5=td4MhTGx38_oA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iK+5roJN6m+Wbvxe8S5GEf4Lx1Ucp8yrsOOsnFucNr_Qw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
Message-ID: <61a8dbfa-15bc-429f-279e-ca35dc033cd4@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:13:53 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iK+5roJN6m+Wbvxe8S5GEf4Lx1Ucp8yrsOOsnFucNr_Qw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ZsLltyoDkRRN3gp7KjW3XxmognU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] A conversational description of sentinel.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:13:58 -0000

On 07/02/2018 10:12, Warren Kumari wrote:
> Whoops, last message was blank; finger fail.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:57 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>> Fine. Now we need to have something actionable, e.g. set of names for
>>> Geoff to test.
>>>
>>> Can we have couple proposals and test them in one go, so results are
>>> comparable?
>>>
>>> I've gathered these:
>>>
>>> kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-NNNN
>>> kskroll-sentinel-not-ta-NNNN
>>> is-ta--NNNN
>>> not-ta--NNNN
>>>
>>> I propose longer but more descriptive variant:
>>> kskroll-sentinel-dnssec-root-trust-anchor-key-trusted-yes-NNN
>>> kskroll-sentinel-dnssec-root-trust-anchor-key-trusted-no-NNNN
> 
> <no hats>
> 
> I personally like "kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-NNNN", or "is-ta--NNNN".
> 
> I really do not like
> "kskroll-sentinel-dnssec-root-trust-anchor-key-trusted-yes-NNN" as:
> $echo "kskroll-sentinel-dnssec-root-trust-anchor-key-trusted-yes-NNN" | wc -c
>    62


For what it is worth, I am with Warren, and particular like
"kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-NNNN".


-- Benno

-- 
Benno J. Overeinder
NLnet Labs
https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email