IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1-03

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Fri, 11 April 2025 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F411AE1E13 for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hardakers.net
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e6D5N8OOmQb5 for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [107.220.113.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 775741AE1E0D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B23C26962 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.hardakers.net 8B23C26962
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardakers.net; s=default; t=1744400201; bh=tsnuRjaXSUo1LmnSHJIWhB406oL91ordjBofvOzaMx0=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ThC8RhHhDt+FY6/Zh3RBKSDWiSKdEHfwEEvkm0hrympLrNrGsrgx0yfWXbfJcATKZ 6k6b+8w+HKZuWYJHMHAZal9kdLv0OdE4T1X2QyBsH6NEPHUj4fJLvHUVk/h+s4jjSV Q5FwEhkzADymcgAAhCZoQDbcZV/Z0kHM+s13Yj1s=
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <Z-9BfUMGhl-67Rsz@chardros.imrryr.org> (Viktor Dukhovni's message of "Fri, 4 Apr 2025 13:18:37 +1100")
References: <174014439163.230.14040485401966230734@dt-datatracker-7fdd5d767c-975l9> <ybl34fahbns.fsf@wx.hardakers.net> <m1y0x1s63s.fsf@narrans.de> <yblv7rl5fee.fsf@wd.hardakers.net> <Z-9BfUMGhl-67Rsz@chardros.imrryr.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:36:41 -0700
Message-ID: <yblplhimqwm.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-ID-Hash: BNYGD6MKHB54GFRCFIBSCRFGPGNRH3GC
X-Message-ID-Hash: BNYGD6MKHB54GFRCFIBSCRFGPGNRH3GC
X-MailFrom: wjhns1@hardakers.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1-03
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ZxZnma-eTqQdyRDSBv2smOt7gNw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> writes:

> I'd like to suggest a change in section 4:

Hi Viktor et al,

Warren and I discussed this today and came up with the edit we just
pushed to -06:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1/

diff:

https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1-05&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-sha1-06&difftype=--html

The goals were to make the document not make any suggestions, because
that was the whole point of going down this road with the revamped IANA
tables: we should leave all references to what "to do" to those tables
and stop making in-document recommendations that need to be revisited.

Hopefully the new version makes sense given this discussion (which
everyone that has posted indicated support for making some change).
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status