Re: [DNSOP] draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-01.txt

Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> Mon, 26 October 2015 10:12 UTC

Return-Path: <roy@dnss.ec>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA771B3AAB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lFlYsNtjdzFg for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C9F41B3AAA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so106602021wic.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dnss.ec; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rasMCODvdhzrw74xRp10DKpnmDIdKIx+0IjGD4Mrwds=; b=M34l4sKdvLhcCoXj4V3GYJLW3IUcZzdoB4UEq3+pBCOEK2C1YbhJEDhEKY+8rOQkM1 kS/HXziBYrkPzt8mNtYCtJNyHdQ4DjQ+ks8OmogZ6EqDCP7HbOJuSpzn/LVjrAIo5o2M jzsbmv6e7RkpSLxeEq2PQ1X14jwzhg7h4VHxY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rasMCODvdhzrw74xRp10DKpnmDIdKIx+0IjGD4Mrwds=; b=TAHR3AnP+kN7tHjnOUGVRRBQ98Z8oW+fmbknh+pWjLL6QTLldxhp145YVjEUIqioxf AoQyvkp0piDvR0XyfFxD3DMPGgAN6sywy2ZvZZbys0+I3RihSg+e737SFkiIaJdv2hbk FpU7zAul4zoccipav1TM8HUtavHk41kOk9sTxyENlrVJ8Inyx3HRgaQFnH6BfWg2Wek/ Vt9XS5gz0PIlFCYWZ17wEiw5UJ+KITF9j0f+aWQSiT3aEd5mMI4k/uMhJTRTBLN0A5BH +E6rtTjLpW66NqRwGmHSbNcPRzPxzlBhV9HxE9XVY+wHX57LYmfv3B7CLv1u0SR6hI0t V9MQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnhfuIctKd49AVkvtE5uzJLgyOWnDbehET8I9txt7gegcM9RKP6sSPSjt1vTJDFT106A+9e
X-Received: by 10.194.89.135 with SMTP id bo7mr7992735wjb.147.1445854364808; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.18.129.194] (cust-47-75.cust.o2.ie. [62.40.47.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t7sm13310047wib.1.2015.10.26.03.12.43 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
In-Reply-To: <562DF7D8.9080004@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:12:42 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EDDBDA0A-172A-4ABF-ABCD-7D1282AD2C9F@dnss.ec>
References: <20150310.191541.52184726.fujiwara@jprs.co.jp> <5753B8EC-60EC-44F3-872E-94766558EE50@redbarn.org> <20151025104914.GA23386@sources.org> <4681433.xxzpcmHjWT@sume.local> <562DED9E.40305@bellis.me.uk> <7D9666A0-BC5D-425F-A5F4-40E53C2B80C4@dnss.ec> <562DF7D8.9080004@bellis.me.uk>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_07kaA_WB9EptPIc00qzRbdsoa0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:12:48 -0000

> On 26 Oct 2015, at 09:52, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 26/10/2015 09:50, Roy Arends wrote:
>> Speaking only for myself, though I happen to be one of the authors.
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>> An Empty Non Terminal NoData response requires the same NSEC records as
>> an Name Error Response.
> 
> That's clear - what isn't perhaps, is what the RCODE should be, given
> that this text is in a section with "Name Error" in its title.

This section doesn’t give guidance on what RCODE to set.

I understand that you’re surprised and I hope I clarified it.

Roy