Re: [DNSOP] Preliminary agenda for IETF89, London

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Sat, 22 February 2014 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F461A0198 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 13:43:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yHnoOnDXBEfj for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 13:43:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEF91A0180 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 13:43:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 4B0DE3B7EE; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:43:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 41AD5190736; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 22:39:10 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 22:39:10 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Message-ID: <20140222213910.GA14475@sources.org>
References: <530781B9.7070004@gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1402211227190.19817@bofh.nohats.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1402211227190.19817@bofh.nohats.ca>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 7.3
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_BIKSUVRdTEiWbzP5ZQavo492sk
Cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Preliminary agenda for IETF89, London
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:43:15 -0000

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:29:40PM -0500,
 Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>; wrote 
 a message of 25 lines which said:

> >		draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-privacy-sol
...
> Why is TLS for DNS (not 'TLS over DNS') not listed at 3.1?

Following on Tim's response, I draw your attention on the fact that
one of the solutions mentioned in draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-privacy-sol,
"QNAME minimization", is not a protocol change at all and can
therefore be discussed even by the most charter-strict members of
DNSOP :-)