[DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error-19
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Sun, 10 May 2026 00:19 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4E3EBE14B2 for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 9 May 2026 17:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1778372365; bh=uaxd3qF2w90HloDdh9BbWRowxWWSGCM1roiDVWPPdOM=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=hqmOySG9Hrl1a7ZH3tRiouica0m4UMZGeQMax8xFfxCD5UoproAFtOLcw3HvtOEU4 WZ6YEAXpDLycMX8su7Pj45YjND/4VqnaMtUWl/keHZg+heI8DzjDwMlIGxqyRxzZ9R Wgy2Bq+vQ1Hn8bzxEi6B1E2wWBdvdxXUXylFrtPc=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b="CM2T/8WM"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="fRfteMQj"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pmP6Mij8oaOV for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 9 May 2026 17:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fhigh-b7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b7-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.158]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72672EBE149B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 May 2026 17:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515797A0051; Sat, 9 May 2026 20:19:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phl-frontend-04 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 09 May 2026 20:19:15 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1778372355; x=1778458755; bh=Srzipq14D4NeivOeHXsPKhF4BrfhGIzpct+KN4RNWfI=; b= CM2T/8WMowdie340fzdAAoSrzghwIsSVqtvBTKAdRW36nkPg9Mib1d57Oa8BiQRM 11RFIYKEbE7EPQOtp1yU6ZChnr1xcE0sxiBk9P9JFpWQJO2xRous50mxP4/crSNX 4QdHBrxKzsqY0N6D4pW259OiN4Lj1EKT9W42od39Hqz17VYWVxG4hQGmLw1TtJvS 0Vd4bb8EokdDzjKFYLtWGNiglBJ6gh66/CsD0wQSFa9jxzLHRWBltRZp9t9wobAq eblvD81/u+DC6DoiClrBAkAa5XqCOeTsMW7ABVVmaQzSpQ693hvyDtwClHwFN9tb cg13mtHynH9TOmB7Yj04mw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1778372355; x= 1778458755; bh=Srzipq14D4NeivOeHXsPKhF4BrfhGIzpct+KN4RNWfI=; b=f RfteMQj8E6IeEwBjXPGoWtAuwgQ4FfUMimTUnLJkPuRhsYldXvSHEB6p6j2KBytk idQnzXKnt4V9tDamzfR0KUaDNCcAsEoHQ2IcNeUWyyG/NHQtqjlknrsCuBYHOSWr Tqf9FbhrPJsy+u3DdRTC31WlpqJtGEcEgP9SAGVBrcsvXTAvfZHpkgJvPbYzCqxX y7k9/5q/TXv/sLJ8zSvMoRe8KtuaSFZnZOkYeynzGwOtYAdEb3E+a9zus9hZVREw sAC3Ln5oi4NhgXl2QVd5p9mB8uZ1f/DW86nG/1+CsSdMrgZc0QHPhckgP2Pp1Ye1 ZQda+kqPf4j0UjCvwzbYQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:As__af3NSZDDsY3CDV0WyBJxHD4c8u87S0l081MY1Z0Scr_hYAVahw> <xme:As__aYEgo34dAzN5h3CpwFRgUFZo075xT_594Y8UqwBAW45HQa0X0eyaxJwKSoEBm Q9qohfuB_2yRtfz2CygP4Pu-I4xJ2FsHBLfQcrw77sRAE-nYA2lJN8>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:As__aWhL03cU9ThTwef75tnh9PJqI8-CRqWi3SJTaey4J6shs_MLVkzicB6ZtGHpxVa6E6XZ3Dftm7Kl3HkbQH9c2pX5PD1RfitzTZyizbK5OTeHLJHT9w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgdduudegieeiucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurheptggguffhjgffvefgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepfefhhfelleejjeejieekhfejfeeiheetgeejgffhudegveeigeehgefftdetudet necuffhomhgrihhnpehmnhhothdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtpdhnsggprhgtphht thhopeekpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegvvhihnhgtkhgvpeegtd gtihhstghordgtohhmsegumhgrrhgtrdhivghtfhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehmuhhk shesmhhukhhunhgurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepkhhonhguthhirhesghhmrghilhdrtg homhdprhgtphhtthhopegunhhsohhpsehivghtfhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegurghn fihinhhgsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepnhgvihhlrdgtohhokhesnhhofi grrhgvrdgtohdruhhkpdhrtghpthhtohepmhhohhgrmhgvugdrsghouhgtrggurghirhes ohhrrghnghgvrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepsggvnhhnohesnhhlnhgvthhlrggsshdrnh hl
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:As__aTCJTm-SDLJFmtS7P507mSFWHAzpAi0RQNod9V2q7ljMWcokTg> <xmx:As__aQTatI7at2u7IF0K5eLFsqQjOt5ur90pic59ae8wop2NjE1TCA> <xmx:As__aQVMROVE-3DR9EeAexq_8hCs07Q_CqNlvY32Rek321muAMQ2tg> <xmx:As__aRexGuzRxK5OhCeJn5LiACf_2l8Vc-yeWLiKUSBTaxMlfT2-Gg> <xmx:A8__aTMBo-qz9ohF2qLVBB-Ewbnjep_E_nALQwiL4pXf0fjSl7IMcJnC>
Feedback-ID: ie6694242:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 9 May 2026 20:19:11 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.500.181\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB4966FD11066304902E30BCB9A93A2@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 10:19:07 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B98883D5-B6A9-4039-9C9D-B1BCEAE7E46D@mnot.net>
References: <PH0PR11MB49665D117EA1C0C920A1ED0FA93E2@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAFpG3geNkMs=_HeeirUcRX2-GXW5wEHZiYTLUj0Q_5CYVeVmWQ@mail.gmail.com> <SA2PR11MB4972BEA47D1E95384D5A82AFA93D2@SA2PR11MB4972.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <af4QDrlZ-5hCfL_c@p5> <af4S9qW-LHOdQwQF@p5> <af4a6Hm9Eaql7qS9@p5> <PH0PR11MB4966FD11066304902E30BCB9A93A2@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.500.181)
Message-ID-Hash: UHKTIKH7DAFLJ3YYLQ2IAUW27BQMKLRI
X-Message-ID-Hash: UHKTIKH7DAFLJ3YYLQ2IAUW27BQMKLRI
X-MailFrom: mnot@mnot.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@mukund.org>, tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Dan Wing <danwing@gmail.com>, "neil.cook@noware.co.uk" <neil.cook@noware.co.uk>, Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, Benno Overeinder <benno@nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error-19
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_Iso8DSucAwgvY1zv7exNHcSPJ0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>
I'd be concerned if we started rebuilding HTTP semantics inside DNS. The merit of putting links instead of strings inside the response is that you can then use language negotiation (etc.) for a richer experience when called for without burdening DNS. Emitting another bit of fingerprinting data on all DNS requests is likely to be controversial, and also will require significant implementation effort. Cheers, > On 9 May 2026, at 5:36 pm, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Mukund, > > This is indeed what I would go for, same as Accept 'negotiation' over HTTP > > An important change for this I-D though. > > Regards > > -éric > > On 08/05/2026, 19:19, "Mukund Sivaraman" <muks@mukund.org> wrote: > > > Perhaps a client can indicate its locale in an EDNS option in the query, > and the server responds with a single localized set of fields matching > what the client requested, or if that is not available, whatever > language the server has. > > Mukund > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-leave@ietf.org -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- [DNSOP] AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structured-… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… tirumal reddy
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Mukund Sivaraman
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Mukund Sivaraman
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Mukund Sivaraman
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Dan Wing
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Mukund Sivaraman
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dns… Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Mark Nottingham
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Mukund Sivaraman
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Mark Nottingham
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… tirumal reddy
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Lars Eggert
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Lars Eggert
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… tirumal reddy
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Lars Eggert
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… tirumal reddy
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structu… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)