IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Deprecating the status opcode

"Michael J. Sheldon" <msheldon@godaddy.com> Thu, 16 May 2019 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <msheldon@godaddy.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F5B120240 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 08:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rKJJvjeXLElL for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 08:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr690127.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.69.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B637E1201F1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 08:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-secureservernet-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=DvEWreOIYUc1s0dt8OPk9cH1GJyWzIV/iclBSJR7Bp8=; b=a1SWH7EW5gxohx11k6YD22p9eHYHCf8lV2cq+K3lm7h8nHrgje1rs7OU8qRL3boCOdhluaLftte+k+AYrQUVCcLASZm7VQO1Ns9qrtD88Crof8LScku0YqoyZ5t7F834e6YurvCChreQl1HJ2GyGtX/ALhBd6RfGHYaqfk2nDhg=
Received: from BYAPR02MB5190.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (20.177.124.15) by BYAPR02MB4808.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (52.135.232.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1900.16; Thu, 16 May 2019 15:46:49 +0000
Received: from BYAPR02MB5190.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::589e:65df:84a:cd26]) by BYAPR02MB5190.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::589e:65df:84a:cd26%6]) with mapi id 15.20.1900.010; Thu, 16 May 2019 15:46:49 +0000
From: "Michael J. Sheldon" <msheldon@godaddy.com>
To: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] Deprecating the status opcode
Thread-Index: AQHVCwXd7Nlg4K1H3EiqyTJoH6HiSaZsaU8AgAAP/4CAARNhAIAAWkmA
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 15:46:48 +0000
Message-ID: <2f2f35be-963f-e217-950c-a11130489c5e@godaddy.com>
References: <064BA295-F3DD-46E4-86A9-E03CF68EB6BC@sinodun.com> <20190515170020.3F76420141A62A@ary.qy> <CA+nkc8DTfhf7N9Wx0EaRC7kTWJcRMdv2v6P9Z+HH0DzvGbAuhw@mail.gmail.com> <7eca1d5a-bf88-b004-e260-be5eaeaffb05@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <7eca1d5a-bf88-b004-e260-be5eaeaffb05@nic.cz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2600:8800:2800:8db:6a6e:1d88:205:32e2]
x-clientproxiedby: BYAPR05CA0052.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:74::29) To BYAPR02MB5190.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:68::15)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=msheldon@godaddy.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5ccf71d9-90c9-4872-959e-08d6da15b510
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR02MB4808;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR02MB4808:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR02MB4808206A988C8B0220764A6CDB0A0@BYAPR02MB4808.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 0039C6E5C5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(376002)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(346002)(199004)(189003)(66946007)(73956011)(31686004)(66476007)(64756008)(66556008)(53936002)(66446008)(6512007)(66574012)(229853002)(71190400001)(2906002)(5660300002)(6246003)(14444005)(68736007)(256004)(5640700003)(6486002)(71200400001)(6436002)(11346002)(446003)(52116002)(486006)(8676002)(2616005)(6116002)(6916009)(7736002)(476003)(99286004)(386003)(186003)(25786009)(46003)(53546011)(305945005)(76176011)(14454004)(81166006)(86362001)(316002)(81156014)(1730700003)(6506007)(2351001)(478600001)(102836004)(36756003)(2501003)(8936002)(31696002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR02MB4808; H:BYAPR02MB5190.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: godaddy.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: cHlgJsZ17ig6rshveCLWMfaVmN+EmS/F9pw7IDSRfgyuzP9bkQxi6GWpIJD70+AGU+v3LpQveMW57hNyFX+hGy33KMoNhDs+r3rDNNMYe2xb2Y3XMhq9xPHIXqTWkuf8DVlLfLs1JKUlP3RFnw4Cw6pbtPJ8h10bPa84Vljrf6nRZoDTMcKaYmYNm9GjmZr0yoQ2bwYz+hGEMMFpDfRm1XCYvt5ttIsAC3CFjXITespAkq5Pit45ddkFko3AavC99sx60L3aoPMYMNsZ4Eq3Cfn3JRnnfF0o7oV7tUQ+8c+mjgDh0l6XnZhRuDt3BYBx6GtoI/y5Z1AMbDVC/LvLJG1rM5CLxIkQzXaohftaQd0wvtuKOC9pFHe4xUTt6GTIuv6IGP/VMhwdotP0rNsFOZoIaRWjkt76rAcL3cWr0eQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <64FE2E98B23FE24EA317F22A2496593D@namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: godaddy.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5ccf71d9-90c9-4872-959e-08d6da15b510
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 May 2019 15:46:48.8733 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: d5f1622b-14a3-45a6-b069-003f8dc4851f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR02MB4808
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_PhMFinGewwxtdNaFm-srsmQScY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Deprecating the status opcode
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 15:46:54 -0000

On 5/16/19 3:23 AM, Petr Špaček wrote:
> Notice: This email is from an external sender.
> 
> 
> 
> On 15. 05. 19 19:57, Bob Harold wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 1:00 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com
>> <mailto:johnl@taugh.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     In article <064BA295-F3DD-46E4-86A9-E03CF68EB6BC@sinodun.com
>>     <mailto:064BA295-F3DD-46E4-86A9-E03CF68EB6BC@sinodun.com>> you write:
>>     >-=-=-=-=-=-
>>     >
>>     >Hi,
>>     >
>>     >In the spirit of deprecating things I have submitted a draft to
>>     deprecate the status opcode.
>>
>>     RFC 1034 says it's "To be defined" so this seems a little premature.
>>
>>     Other than that, go for it.
>>
>>
>> Does this increase or decrease the 'camel' page count?
> 
> Personally I think it is not worth the effort, it will just add one more
> RFC to read and does not help the protocol maintenance.
> 
> I would say that it is better to have one "cleanup" RFC instead of
> one-off doc with one useful paragraph in it. With one bigger document we
> could say to newcommers "this is list of things you can ignore when you
> encounter them in pile of DNS RFCs".
>

In a perfect world, we'd have occasional complete rewrites like what
happened with RFCs 821, 2821, 5321 and RFCs 822, 2822, 5322



-- 
Michael Sheldon
Dev-DNS Services
GoDaddy.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email