Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-03.txt

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Mon, 07 January 2019 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C70512008A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 12:22:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SEIr9XrEYIdn for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 12:22:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2450612D7EA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 12:22:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 453D321C09; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 12:22:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: =?utf-8?B?VmxhZGltw61yIMSMdW7DoXQ=?= <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <154534677023.19023.8195828695262063685@ietfa.amsl.com> <cbb3b947-0799-26b1-d6c9-11ae63051525@nic.cz>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 12:22:53 -0800
In-Reply-To: <cbb3b947-0799-26b1-d6c9-11ae63051525@nic.cz> (=?utf-8?B?IlZs?= =?utf-8?B?YWRpbcOtciDEjHVuw6F0Iidz?= message of "Fri, 21 Dec 2018 17:29:18 +0100")
Message-ID: <ybl8szwb4ki.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_SZIl41ultQBVEED-0gNTWrbPr8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 20:22:55 -0000

Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>; writes:

> Unsupported algorithms (4.1.5 + 4.1.6):
> I'm a bit confused why these conditions are meant for SERVFAIL.  Has
> something changed?
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4035#section-5.2 (paragraph "If the
> validator does not support...")

You're absolutely correct, of course, and I'm changing the error code
for those to be "NOERROR" instead.  That means they're also a great
reason why we need extended information even for NOERROR.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI