Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-05

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 10 October 2016 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B74D1294AA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 07:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=Jo1Y7ylj; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=ZClYB9Cv
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4TsH0dQLn69v for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46559127ABE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 97104 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2016 14:46:13 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=17b4e.57fba9b5.k1610; bh=rS3DYX2G0zkJc2b4qeLjkFnZauBXzrI12hw4ApjgKmQ=; b=Jo1Y7yljcrYthxwuaiq/y9HnrNs6vTfv3KcLaHIG+azKVOiuD50ml4HnIw6DigKo7o6/wrjcrsuKmEKLWYaHtTRVWgvO3/PNbR+DOCqEF0g17DhaLjkUz7b/cTff75xICaaC+szunvtw+QeY6KLSRrROJ3N4WaUTX+As1PmU0BcodFn/ar1DJ5bUs1rjkO8uuN2VHOngY23X0dHL15A43+Tj8odK4gteyesbjZNx1pWDgnudAeS9xJDLJiYoH6QT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=17b4e.57fba9b5.k1610; bh=rS3DYX2G0zkJc2b4qeLjkFnZauBXzrI12hw4ApjgKmQ=; b=ZClYB9CvbyqdKXB2epjN/DYCMAzyM6oRsDQm2lgfudFJWKGRKwM7fnHVu4VHb/NpHXuweffhCP5C6+jaFit9+HF/s9LSLULtynFDiVR/84wss9OUcMu0jvOp2qDzmv+24IDug8Cs0gLlsR0XhUzE2FfShbgWtXK81aNjQ0zf0Y4Yc5mB9NXUPzta0/mpdHHwQRSxu/n27+lGNG06oY87ty1SvG08EXodP5T4obZr6vvkFMzZ3hHmA5XNaL+k0Y9f
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 10 Oct 2016 14:46:13 -0000
Date: 10 Oct 2016 10:46:13 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1610101045270.73837@ary.qy>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20161010143437.zeay65juueutqwoe@nic.fr>
References: <a63bb766-527b-c752-22a1-fccae8535ddc@xylant.net> <20161009173634.34142.qmail@ary.lan> <20161010143437.zeay65juueutqwoe@nic.fr>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_Tm8xJ6T8gx2WjWCgNdkBEz1dAo>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, federico@xylant.net
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-05
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:46:17 -0000

>> I hate to bring this up, but we might want to reconsider whether .alt
>> is still the best name for this hack.
>
> May be the author of the I-D should change every occurrence of .alt by
> TODO-NAME-TO-BE-DISCUSSED-LATER so we can focus on the idea and avoid
> discussions about the name?

I'd think we could just note that the name is TBD in discussions about 
whether anyone would actually use a generic not-DNS TLD.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly