[DNSOP] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model
Lorenzo Breda <lorenzo@lbreda.com> Wed, 24 July 2024 22:28 UTC
Return-Path: <lorenzo@lbreda.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24826C1D6FCA; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.005
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lbreda.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WEGWe_ab56_O; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lbreda.com (lbreda.com [146.59.198.160]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07077C1DFD27; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lbreda.com; s=mail2019; t=1721860080; bh=EY+mtDOUuiu8sENjgl6uHLN7h1SHCOebqi7n4Bi9KIU=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=sHXfuJrLjp+wCVHj5MUydYdhCGe635oTPgTeGH9QhyV1MJwI5u3BFYEVBPh0LopRY 38xaUx+O5pOCS1DtSbpu4wTDF01UQrsoTymJ2qm6nf9sAXL5BZqBj2FLX0/czx86IZ T2s6gGG+WOdNQoe0eecxs/OgboEncu4Yi9U25NSWhlNPhWdBx37A2Glmj2+Ufv4TVq WfdXoSkc6NI3ugE9f6xFyLXF3Zy9lCOsWp4zsT6VsfN9DXXieVUvTQySjMEMItrKKJ AlYsvip9+/8szjD5qjCENATFrWhrAd7iWyjS0RO5qYR0t2h85crF+RhkYGgJ6EGqhu x1GeaNrWB9UfQ==
Received: by mail-lj1-f173.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f025b94e07so3510171fa.0; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXhBoAoqGX7fzwkJGcnAkfwilR/Ed7z/gvt2NK/jKTJu/2iIq11ay36pzoWVG2jrOiOb7AE2g6cwj8bMu9CxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzwFRG0ruh/r4/xAkdKiITJb6Mn7digP2rvQWjgQo4pKejE8cut T0bTD3Qo6DYVQ1jVXHTKQkEeYvbzb2oCeibBq52eSsRTTauDAFT+idbd7ddviAF6bT+p2OZJIz1 JLo7tri2N1cCxl5EMcJnPu/XFgiQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFQj5WuflELr2pTMou4fQaXIa9G76RtweIHZ+/PdQy0vjT5K9ew0n9523rA6Q4HR/ZsfGvZvmrUt1smpAWVpcM=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:87c5:0:b0:2ef:20ae:d111 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f03db6ccdemr306081fa.6.1721860077581; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
References: <65daf988-f696-4f35-5a72-5b11ef4893b8@spacelypackets.com> <CAEhHO_MaUFraCuur2uYEBrRcdKUty3ZwoPsFeP3V1iXf5vQxxA@mail.gmail.com> <b098f7cb-e42b-c7e4-56b8-dcb9125c17e9@spacelypackets.com> <CAEhHO_P4VmCC0VfxHRPdnvUzzwamMThbcuQAp1N98yWTCd-Bsg@mail.gmail.com> <0685c4ca-0b10-d7a8-ccd4-507dc6755d1a@spacelypackets.com> <CAEhHO_PbrkKqaJsBD+Fih+i1rY5YN+9=Y-fNUpOp2PfXL+hAuA@mail.gmail.com> <f5855742-810b-b10b-d83b-55ea64744975@spacelypackets.com> <CAEhHO_PU0AhVjSKUDM_dPRxscnrJO8LuoROkmsAni=sOPU0JKw@mail.gmail.com> <abb81b38-34cc-ef9e-3f5d-732054a2cc49@spacelypackets.com>
In-Reply-To: <abb81b38-34cc-ef9e-3f5d-732054a2cc49@spacelypackets.com>
From: Lorenzo Breda <lorenzo@lbreda.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:27:45 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAEhHO_MYX81xgkSQ0ZtJtn+3n7nYhrJhAjaHv7fQ5p1bdvxMDg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEhHO_MYX81xgkSQ0ZtJtn+3n7nYhrJhAjaHv7fQ5p1bdvxMDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Johnson <scott@spacelypackets.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000047031c061e05cab6"
Message-ID-Hash: ERW7QX3XYP44EL7TBI55M7GW6WPAEPR5
X-Message-ID-Hash: ERW7QX3XYP44EL7TBI55M7GW6WPAEPR5
X-MailFrom: lorenzo@lbreda.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dtn@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_Vabd1-WG4VZP69yKEqYgeSZ0lU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>
Il giorno gio 25 lug 2024 alle ore 00:13 Scott Johnson < scott@spacelypackets.com> ha scritto: > > > I'm mostly concerned about signatures for integrity check and sender > > identity check. PGP and its derivatives, for example (here in Italy we > > have the PEC system, a government standard to send emails with > > integrated integrity check, it would be broken). > > Yay. Now we are getting somewhere... a problem to be solved :) > > Let me first consider the problem for a bit. I will come back to you > after a think on this. I am assuming you want this integrity check to > pass when emailing Italian assets on Mars, or when assets on the Moon are > emailing you, and mangling the payload so the user can't click $BADLINK is > the issue. How do these email systems interact with external entities > email systems? As normal? What happens to the integrity check if you > were to send an email to my MTA, which does not support it? > It interacts with other email system as a regular email (with some signature attachments). A client may verify it if enabled, but some of the characteristics would not work. A PEC email is meant to be sent from a PEC email system to another PEC email system. It uses regular MTAs for transport, anyway. You can find a formal description on RFC 6109. Italy is working with other European States to define a common European system based on it. > > You are suggesting that "leaving the current TLDs implicitly on Earth by > default," as defined below, alleviates this problem? > Yes, since it eliminates the need to rewrite signed content. -- Lorenzo Breda
- [DNSOP] An Interplanetary DNS Model Scott Johnson
- [DNSOP] Re: [dtn] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model Scott Johnson
- [DNSOP] Re: [dtn] An Interplanetary DNS Model Nordgren, Bryce - FS, MT
- [DNSOP] Re: [dtn] An Interplanetary DNS Model Ben Schwartz
- [DNSOP] Re: [dtn] An Interplanetary DNS Model Scott Johnson
- [DNSOP] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model Scott Johnson
- [DNSOP] Re: [IPNSIG PWG] Re: [dtn] Re: An Interpl… Sivasubramanian M
- [DNSOP] Re: [dtn] An Interplanetary DNS Model Ondřej Surý
- [DNSOP] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model Lorenzo Breda
- [DNSOP] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model Lorenzo Breda
- [DNSOP] Re: [IPNSIG PWG] Re: [dtn] Re: An Interpl… Sivasubramanian M
- [DNSOP] Re: [dtn] An Interplanetary DNS Model Scott Johnson
- [DNSOP] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model Scott Johnson
- [DNSOP] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model Ben Schwartz
- [DNSOP] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model Lorenzo Breda
- [DNSOP] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model Scott Johnson
- [DNSOP] Re: [dtn] An Interplanetary DNS Model Marc Blanchet
- [DNSOP] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model Scott Johnson
- [DNSOP] Re: [dtn] An Interplanetary DNS Model Scott Johnson
- [DNSOP] Re: [dtn] An Interplanetary DNS Model Marc Blanchet
- [DNSOP] Re: [dtn] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model Scott Johnson
- [DNSOP] Re: [EXT] [dtn] Re: An Interplanetary DNS… Sipos, Brian J.
- [DNSOP] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model Scott Johnson
- [DNSOP] Re: [EXT] [dtn] Re: An Interplanetary DNS… Scott Johnson
- [DNSOP] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model Lorenzo Breda
- [DNSOP] Re: [EXT] [dtn] Re: An Interplanetary DNS… Sipos, Brian J.
- [DNSOP] Re: [EXT] [dtn] Re: An Interplanetary DNS… Scott Johnson
- [DNSOP] Re: An Interplanetary DNS Model Lorenzo Breda