IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query

Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> Mon, 09 November 2015 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <each@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856051B8423 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 12:52:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SEHST-R1Micd for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 12:52:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 272D61B8421 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 12:52:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [149.20.48.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D531B349421; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 20:52:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id C591A216C1C; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 20:52:32 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 20:52:32 +0000
From: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Message-ID: <20151109205232.GA42848@isc.org>
References: <5635CF1A.4030803@gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1511091301260.25050@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <A8A3F4DA-EE53-4BA4-9EF7-6DCB6120350B@vpnc.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1511091651330.25050@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1511091651330.25050@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_W8WBv48zR68JDg8u65sHGzSDvg>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 20:52:35 -0000

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:55:24PM +0000, Tony Finch wrote:
> With the current DNS protocol, a stub resolver can get all the records it
> needs to validate a response in 1RTT, by sending multiple concurrent
> queries for all the possible delegation points in the QNAME.

But has to retain state for all those active queries, which adds a fair
bit of complexity.  I would expect it to be a lot more straightforward to
code a stub validator using CHAIN.

-- 
Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status