IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Please review and provide feedback -- draft-stw-6761ext

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Fri, 23 August 2019 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45D312009C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hopcount.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dt9s141d9WE6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34192120047 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id 18so23326178ioe.10 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=c2W58+4VPxFk9f9C1vLvhLqG1OELgyNbJuLfNc4BYBM=; b=aGGfXddldcF71rcC+4g2MO1iasnEZEKKXlvUtLXpIYGDAQ2k8W/TN+JgAqLNTTc3Qd HwqE1UssnJATbR+QPdz8hyqaiufNxnY256I+qn2rvZrrhjiU8XH2OsVC/Zm+v3r47z5u UHPqkJ0cgg9Ol0zyT2fgWhwCrn7KqVTummvT4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=c2W58+4VPxFk9f9C1vLvhLqG1OELgyNbJuLfNc4BYBM=; b=YLFt25ZZEmFa0cvvUBfYzxqASSXESLjz9/kpqdauLax15mRL9yDfU9Pyi2iIdKPkw9 zEvN4VAihak+7eJS7YTw0qjIpOcnb+6CIWAaTQ5zLm17x7AXj5PLoZ1fG+QPjQioxxWM WtGqtRe/yAjZPsqZTd+5vfnJvpb7P0kowRPwcpbogYfJlvYBrTXTQ6ShCsj04GNBhEpM qx15/u2wZGIKWAxMocrfr7lFeUBJkd+qFSMq347Vay9/26FvZOkCtrXix36HU6BrwZQY +qje5Gr5ABYEK4Iy6nKPP5YaRqCc1+kmDDglqzrZLoD3QH7k/cvmVbDjjFcefftABDXY fk9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXveN4fpIRnB3asZJ5+WjAMbAj8JnK5sLqagmGpE+g79xnHagh5 AGDS6NVUT18gZGBY/VwwvKRCGw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzdtKP6rt5RtML129q08pDovi2Bkh75jkW7cpGsTe6qkn48f2mlpsiMCvSkwj8RupAN1CNY7A==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9904:: with SMTP id x4mr4337101iol.198.1566596346375; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.50] (24-246-23-138.cable.teksavvy.com. [24.246.23.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l26sm3886021ioj.24.2019.08.23.14.39.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Message-Id: <E7BB0409-1C4B-43A5-9505-DFA8504FA340@hopcount.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3A2A95B0-248F-41E4-9F45-0E1FF819328D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 17:39:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20190818182935.F172A87452C@ary.qy>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, suzworldwide@gmail.com
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <20190818182935.F172A87452C@ary.qy>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_cTmZmNFGaDnsRinCyroBVMImo0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Please review and provide feedback -- draft-stw-6761ext
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 21:39:09 -0000

On 18 Aug 2019, at 14:29, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

[...]

> 2. Names handled through mutant DNS which can returns IP addresses (.local, .localhost, .homenet/.home.arpa)

[...]

> For 2, we seem to agree that future reservations, if any, will go under .arpa.

I think I know what you're getting out here, but I think what we're talking about are things that are not specifically DNS-like in their protocol, but rather correspond to uses where the IETF has some skin in the game.

I think it's clear that nobody has ever shown signs of wanting to anchor anything like this under .ARPA if it's a name that a user might ever have to see. The reason we might imagine we can persuade some people in the future to do so anyway is presumably because the IET has some authority to nudge them in that direction, not because there's some component of the situation that is DNS-protocol-like.


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email