Re: [DNSOP] moving forward on special use names

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 16 September 2016 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EAF12B042 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=FjhXFEF2; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Y6FqNgkz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MtbOlnXj1dXE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 949B9120727 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 85701 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2016 21:58:00 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=14eb6.57dc6ae8.k1609; bh=jkshYnIfhkFFG1Yu4jnrQfa/IKaYm3ql0KHHUtJxPfs=; b=FjhXFEF2txY2WHClGRfLur284moURRs+3DVBK7GPR7OR/lIARkBjw2pvc7J8DRDQwzoZjZzth/VozOlwrcXnOq9+oAKaGVdD+8RnSatgcdgavaZpz7GXYKVwfsEY/S+IsTwgs4hHl14Zl1oM/DK7KmIXt1h833LcA13UGQxqTgQtMrX/1tBW+mskKZsKVmarHiDZQST6iduh5CEy7y7t0b5XXjcZI5HfDNHd80YmeP8miOXJu04z6x0sbxzkmY4e
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=14eb6.57dc6ae8.k1609; bh=jkshYnIfhkFFG1Yu4jnrQfa/IKaYm3ql0KHHUtJxPfs=; b=Y6FqNgkzOf55QF2mFhQP/TZNBcg6bi0xD6hJXVo/k1GkhVIWcnHlzdp1EuP3ll5yffb1XdLjNchCZr6Fc8nQZVxr683botXn/iDPzBAetcvc99K5cRFMUcwd4ZR+9DGiqkHGCxME7BLfSHmWXgwu7303Tun6uM1y3ICE4OiA7wbNkJWQl35N/h3tn/CGwrI8+KMg9A3ppVFK3DqKQFpOkEcxapY1uHCi18U6KqqN1u4VE7DBorYW4NB+YcdYsCr3
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 16 Sep 2016 21:58:00 -0000
Date: 16 Sep 2016 17:58:01 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1609161757100.92010@ary.lan>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Warren Kumari" <warren@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iLG6MOSR2ugs7HrB=+3W9T9zOLvpxWuZN2fi2LmJ0WEKQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D60BBDEF-3C13-44CB-A0D9-DEA98F5297F5@gmail.com> <20160916181356.70566.qmail@ary.lan> <CAPt1N1kQRJVEBY=fP_NF6ViOBbNaPpwEbo5dXHkHkpWWECkQ5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iLODkPtEmihsbKNPQcYwKCQtvkz9JrjDoU=UXUxKtJrLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iLG6MOSR2ugs7HrB=+3W9T9zOLvpxWuZN2fi2LmJ0WEKQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_lxWEY3ZE2uvobahTgb48F4f-dU>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] moving forward on special use names
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 21:58:06 -0000

> ... and I have just posted a new version with the term Domain Names -
> I (and I think Ted) prefer Internet Names, but our preferences are not
> important, we want to do whatever the WG wants.

Personally, I'm more concerned with getting the issues identified, and 
then we can decide what to call them.  Anyone else like my four pronged 
strategy?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly