Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F321A0264
 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  2 Nov 2015 23:40:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 7IY0DbPcSzP5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Mon,  2 Nov 2015 23:40:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com (mail-pa0-x231.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EBFE1A01F4
 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon,  2 Nov 2015 23:40:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pacfv9 with SMTP id fv9so11593733pac.3
 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 23:40:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; 
 h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
 :in-reply-to:content-type;
 bh=g/oJaYKHWwAehKGROKAf21jxEx8xFMc9Jyok+Ex4IMk=;
 b=jYyf9dZRnob1zWc7g9xOI8daAmjo1+8VeNsFkAHQ8RIt8uxuBxN0qHerIUonykn61x
 HAkdvZEzlOsSyIDJwv8RZYaBgaDu0qE9oUms04y/Ipk+hd60JpTT+Q4cx8l6Vu/YQsah
 1n5pkOytYp9cL//lFW3QgFHByghcbx3phr++pwO3x0veFHe/dfiYRNT2MNbj4GzySERS
 7aHwzjEwBHMpJ7UC4OXEfeeIOmIslDwftqIiVKJ3st1fPsd31vikm0kw3ZkIU3OTfeCD
 cN7TvTliLOZB6zf3+yPaBgkNHjkSytvjaeSyAQ0X4PCKDCLIZJjEF2DPYybhZaN2Ew4c
 CJnA==
X-Received: by 10.68.163.195 with SMTP id yk3mr31763766pbb.120.1446536402054; 
 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 23:40:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-36-112.meeting.ietf94.jp (dhcp-36-112.meeting.ietf94.jp.
 [133.93.36.112])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id by6sm27908923pab.25.2015.11.02.23.40.00
 for <dnsop@ietf.org>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 23:40:01 -0800 (PST)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <D258CB42.108E9%edward.lewis@icann.org>
From: Tim WIcinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <563864CE.3080904@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:39:58 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:44.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/44.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D258CB42.108E9%edward.lewis@icann.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------040108060308050407070709"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_pKRyaAWKIIkW__-XYM8Oz-sx9I>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Draft -domain-names-01
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>,
 <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
 <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 07:40:05 -0000

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040108060308050407070709
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


I spoke to Ed this morning during breakfast, and we discussed his 
draft.  I do like this as a well written read through the history of 
namespace and domains, but I feel (and I think Ed even would agree) this 
is not so much a DNSOP document, but something that should be in an area 
where they need a better understanding of DNS (*cough* appsawg *cough*).

How does the working group think of this?

thanks
tim

On 10/30/15 8:23 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
> A while back I floated a draft across this mail list and got (what I
> think) is sufficient (perhaps not the right word) feedback from the WG.  I
> updated the document and resubmitted.  FWIW, this is the document link:
>          https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lewis-domain-names-01
>
> I'm not even asking for comment on the list (but you can if you want).
> When I rev'd the document, I didn't mention it on this list (until now).
>
> What I'm asking for is - when in Yokohama, if you have an interest in this
> I'm willing to discuss.
>
> The issue in the document is both internal to DNS and external to DNS, I'm
> looking for broader input (such as applications area topics).
>
> Ed
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop


--------------040108060308050407070709
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <br>
    <tt>I spoke to Ed this morning during breakfast, and we discussed
      his draft.  I do like this as a well written read through the
      history of namespace and domains, but I feel (and I think Ed even
      would agree) this is not so much a DNSOP document, but something
      that should be in an area where they need a better understanding
      of DNS (*cough* appsawg *cough*).<br>
      <br>
      How does the working group think of this?<br>
      <br>
      thanks<br>
      tim<br>
    </tt><br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/30/15 8:23 PM, Edward Lewis
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:D258CB42.108E9%25edward.lewis@icann.org"
      type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">A while back I floated a draft across this mail list and got (what I
think) is sufficient (perhaps not the right word) feedback from the WG.  I
updated the document and resubmitted.  FWIW, this is the document link:
        <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lewis-domain-names-01">https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lewis-domain-names-01</a>

I'm not even asking for comment on the list (but you can if you want).
When I rev'd the document, I didn't mention it on this list (until now).

What I'm asking for is - when in Yokohama, if you have an interest in this
I'm willing to discuss.

The issue in the document is both internal to DNS and external to DNS, I'm
looking for broader input (such as applications area topics).

Ed
</pre>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:DNSOP@ietf.org">DNSOP@ietf.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------040108060308050407070709--

