Re: [DNSOP] Interim Meeting on Special Names and RFC 6761

On 4/8/15 10:48 PM, str4d wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Tim Wicinski wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> As we announced in Dallas, we’ve decided to have a separate
>> meeting on Special Names and RFC 6761 topics.   We're planning on
>> scheduling this the week of April 13th; with Thursday, April 16th
>> as an initial choice.
>
> Thanks for planning this :)
>
> As someone who has an interest in this particular meeting but has
> never watched or participated in IETF or DNSOP meetings before, how
> will this meeting be conducted? How do people choose to watch or
> participate? The only information I can find that might be related is
> about IEFT interim meetings [0], but there is no scheduled interim
> meeting for this topic [1]. Is there another mailing list or website I
> should be following for more information?
>
> [0] https://www.ietf.org/meeting/interim-meetings.html
> [1] https://www.ietf.org/meeting/interim.html
>

Hi

Suzanne and I met earlier today, in an effort to start setting the 
agenda. We both realized between travel and the larger problem space, we 
needed more time to get this right.

We're now proposing the week of May 11th, 2015.  The chairs don't wish 
to inflict meetings on the working group for Monday or Friday.  We are 
considering Thursday, May 14th 1400 UTC, but will welcome any and all 
opinions on this matter.

Suzanne is drafting an initial agenda and should be forthcoming by 
week's end.  Any suggestions for items are welcome.

thanks

>>
>> If folks have any preference for a date, or conflicts with this
>> one, please let us know. We plan on having the meeting at 2pm UTC,
>> which would translate to 4pm CEST, 10am EST, 7am PST, and 11pm
>> JST. Other suggestions are also welcome-- no time is perfect for
>> everyone but we’re trying to accommodate the widest range of
>> participants that we can.
>
> I haven't seen any further communication (on this ML) about the
> meeting, so I assume the specified date and time is still the case?
> Friday would work better for me than Thursday (which I can't do at 2pm
> UTC), but I'm just one person.
>
>>
>> We’re working on a detailed agenda but the initial plan is to
>> attempt to address both specific drafts and some of the
>> larger-scale issues we’re seeing around the administration of the
>> special-use domain names registry.
>
> Sounds good. I look forward to seeing these issues nailed down.
>
> str4d
>
>>
>> thanks Tim/Suzanne
>>
>> _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list
>>   DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVJehTAAoJEBO17ljAn7PgHiUP+wUdnGPa4R8mn/h1q5Uea28O
> xJChFJBvgvcKv63MAgx9DzuAgSIFokSV+RPtOrJU7j7n3+nidLEnR81Fn44Nu7H4
> wZeXht2ig/DmtIhBYEw5yy3G7vmQF1b+t8c4ev53JzkeOmYefaRVgDQN97MLy49u
> aRBiEOSRY83ax5B9C/10o7MIcB5K5JIRKhy5tHUirc28RimruuiHYh/j8fURtk8a
> qsyGxGLIRT9j64E6PXXLw4o8f90KoX4DWnmdweVnQRaEVxnRoz5btt8PR/9YHLpK
> S+A0aMM0YvphECataGb+xOT6lhE7ObScyPA7UY0Wgra8/Y4JqSja3wBQBfjivnAm
> vd/7qtkFMtRJwd6IJjyL2hzsBd+iIrbrUi8GG5vJXMZzpdg0umte8z0Siq4AeGkw
> 2I9X6a4+Dg/Xbwx5Ar/hC81IxPRNSVwHZ3SFjnEvL2WHofsUF1HchnblvwLVOW/e
> rV/ypgfx/Ii8we0FtgBrqJm25f8JKJVdcfW8K790pE+RI+wUAFjmhYyY2ken6GC3
> 1nwfEJyxoqJZOtHQRP2yXaOosGTFa4nndH5NvlmyVgL3iX/xCFKNnfDD/QhkUPr4
> jAN+j3WlLElRTKLGUGxrrf8hXrFHMw7sARTXgTniant3/pMbrr6LRzYyqaTM8uwL
> 7jEpFZ7Hc6w4O4vILK2b
> =qwv/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>