IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: Side Meeting - DNS Load Balancing

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 29 June 2024 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA8CC14F6A5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 14:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.857
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.857 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="v27zuwqH"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="Kc5I+Ca0"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3yfcTloE8PG7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 14:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5BBEC14F5FA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 14:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 23482 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2024 21:36:25 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=5bb866807e59.k2406; bh=+RBbF1oElEvB8Q8w0Guo1O3t9oFLAwN2wn1HgwGMDek=; b=v27zuwqHpc7rNwkdsfiet4M2TdxDMOkjNVb2jeAVlIbp9j+PDPrZ9m9jOR5pjzZqiYjowSZN4YzB8Q08hgOYoRbbAUP5BMGHSjLzjZkaXz+m695yguXk7evGPIUVCfAbW9eJF08uZqJf6WmW5z2WSopXdmqK01CHciiybm9C0F+KapnlKBfK0tauDqSKQPOxN8N4ihOSvjCytHnIg7XIJqfZqD4yZiENyiVW3kL2YDbOncdbDZ0kDdNgiMh7t6RleF3d3ZA4LzREaD53mcmBIwLfeJuy+nJEnlEiZ8e9FmPbzHGLrLLtuf9LbM2BuB3Wv9DuWJMW/hQUl+6/p8ApZA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=5bb866807e59.k2406; bh=+RBbF1oElEvB8Q8w0Guo1O3t9oFLAwN2wn1HgwGMDek=; b=Kc5I+Ca0N2+qLWsPt6HK3OiYv1Mb5/2HNoBOf4bPo3GFfRPf68Had95hRnCUejpoeUlyJOMDl25esOPyIJbbURedhcmWArV172vX7s1b+b6XGwXOSot8FHmanvxz8daMPrlucTT6gYmwvcMxjrwhHIShV6rddPv1vGqcrWv0hz7ZkOYM9dNkrB4vCcA2dHOwAhJYwIIFhHZao16bBydhr9UwMcXTwGgRbO4wrzyOhUyaGxNVZwhZs8vO/nrWXZZgZXU5rtqe25IhrpVR1mtJV6bjqg3CozAeo+N0qlZHv6cry2IADLvqEgFUmNn9XNmMlIe/l7a4V6eEIseq4GXv/Q==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 29 Jun 2024 21:36:24 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2B2F18E53353; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:36:23 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:36:23 -0400
Message-Id: <20240629213624.2B2F18E53353@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <8C1D853F-17D4-4E2B-B281-F7FCA50DA8B3@strandkip.nl>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: 6MLSQQ7W4HCRRH6GLX5Y7HRMGI5RECOI
X-Message-ID-Hash: 6MLSQQ7W4HCRRH6GLX5Y7HRMGI5RECOI
X-MailFrom: johnl@iecc.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: jabley@strandkip.nl
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: Side Meeting - DNS Load Balancing
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/a2Fdh7mujfR1xVCWPv-hGiuv0-Y>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

It appears that Joe Abley  <jabley@strandkip.nl> said:
>On 29 Jun 2024, at 20:13, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:
>
>> Can you please ensure that there's time on the agenda for discussion on why it remains a bad idea to use the internet's name to resource mapping scheme to perform
>what should be achieved in the routing layer?
>
>This seems like a bit of an inflammatory overreach, Ray :-)

Gee, I was looking forward to a rerun of the anycast vs. TCP argument.

I do like Vixie's point that there should be a way to return the same answer
to everyone and have the client or maybe the client's local cache figure
out the best option.

R's,
John

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status