[DNSOP]Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping-08: (with COMMENT)

[Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to Peter Yee for the GENART review.

** Section 6.  Editorial.
   The level of rigor in Section 4.2 is needed to prevent publication of
   a half-baked DS RRset

Is “half-baked DS RRset” a term-of-art?  To improve readability, I recommend
not using an idiomatic expression.

** Section 7.  Editorial. Per the reference to
[draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping], this should likely be something like
“[This RFC]” and subsequent comment of that string being replaced by the RFC
Editor.

** idnits reports:
  ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 8499 (Obsoleted by RFC 9499)