Re: [DNSOP] my comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis

P Vix <paul@redbarn.org> Fri, 14 April 2017 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F298B12949B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DEkS6Rkl1Nzm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B84B128D69 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.157] (unknown [85.99.254.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE4C261F9E; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 19:54:51 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 19:54:44 +0000
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iKmnjq-mdk6jhOtVAdRTyY9EcbBQ3_7ucZaM2Lp2yF2iw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <58F11DDA.9040307@redbarn.org> <CC2BA9F2-ED01-4271-81D3-E1786413F193@vpnc.org> <CAHw9_iKmnjq-mdk6jhOtVAdRTyY9EcbBQ3_7ucZaM2Lp2yF2iw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----7UNF7RXRHIXHDF7A8KKSN7Z7I8QT0U"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: dnsop@ietf.org, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
From: P Vix <paul@redbarn.org>
Message-ID: <C0C42F33-7AA0-4714-826D-FEDA246366B1@redbarn.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/aHYDtg3JkvJnLkveQmS3y4y8U88>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] my comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 19:54:55 -0000

I accept Warren's alternative wording. Any of them.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.