Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses
"Ralf Weber" <dns@fl1ger.de> Tue, 19 July 2016 07:20 UTC
Return-Path: <dns@fl1ger.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462ED12D0B6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.131
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.131 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZMMO_5P9MjRd for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.guxx.net (smtp.guxx.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:322c::25:42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38067127078 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix, from userid 107) id 356CB5F405A5; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:20:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [64.89.232.131] (unknown [62.217.47.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9952F5F404B7; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:20:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:19:58 +0200
Message-ID: <8034847F-2A8B-4A9A-9F9C-034CB4785C72@fl1ger.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLabVJTzgCQ=TytEeVymwvwzhL4jkcgWf8zhydbjAzsL3dg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1607181050180.27489@bofh.nohats.ca> <BC65B5D1-C49B-4038-92CD-FF629AB9A75D@fl1ger.de> <CAKr6gn2WEAAm-o2appid9Nq+6p09ff0468RoyfqTRK4KMycMOw@mail.gmail.com> <0D351FB1-DA75-4859-9194-9AA8A054BF53@fl1ger.de> <CAL9jLabVJTzgCQ=TytEeVymwvwzhL4jkcgWf8zhydbjAzsL3dg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/aHlbHKG8G5BMDzjiP8tRMen-akA>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 07:20:03 -0000
Moin! On 19 Jul 2016, at 9:00, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Jul 19, 2016 8:36 AM, "Ralf Weber" <dns@fl1ger.de> wrote: >> >> >> Except that if you have a decent size and hot Cache with refreshing >> these records will be in there anyway. IMHO you gained nothing, but I >> agree with Jim Reid that it would be good to have data on this. > > Nothing except some DNS round trips. > How could that matter though? As said I don't believe we have additional round trips between the recursive and the authoritative server in most of the cases. That is what we need data for though. DNS and applications that use DNS have unbelievable levels of caching. So while this all might apply to you if you run your own resolver just for you, it's not the case in big cache deployments most people use (be it their ISP or some big public resolver). So long -Ralf
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] Asking for TCP and/or cookies: a tren… Mukund Sivaraman
- Re: [DNSOP] Asking for TCP and/or cookies: a tren… Mukund Sivaraman
- Re: [DNSOP] Asking for TCP and/or cookies: a tren… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Asking for TCP and/or cookies: a tren… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Asking for TCP and/or cookies: a tren… Mukund Sivaraman
- Re: [DNSOP] Asking for TCP and/or cookies: a tren… Paul Wouters
- [DNSOP] Asking for TCP and/or cookies: a trend? (… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… 延志伟
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… 延志伟
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Peter van Dijk
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… 延志伟
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… 延志伟
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Robert Edmonds
- [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dnsop-m… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] my lone hum against draft-wkumari-dns… Ralf Weber