Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS
Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Mon, 19 March 2018 18:10 UTC
Return-Path: <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0FEE12946D
for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id MrkDiz3Y_HKy for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22f.google.com (mail-ua0-x22f.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22f])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48B10126C25
for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id x17so5039346uaj.12
for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=9r5ReEDdVW9XZ/51iCZknwR32Yvyl1WkLrfCiNqHCSA=;
b=A3vs+qTqcirTBOtCu1Le3UwBWlDo0baC4FFq+YrbNcTSjKrA7/u4DfGthtcDTlJlTB
VDGHM3zlQKRwLt9xN1odMi4SUlYAoWUEib36yoCo0nKWLh9V6h4HPS/rJLESpICk9MLo
KwDSjN3Zc1V/F/BlGcAvmHvRVDWl0ZQemA+Eg2a3ZvvJ4ADWBVD9xST2JB3wgTstKOkW
bO4P/zsET4CFfqYagA/neMbGUYvHdpefg3s1RxcpIoWapme4pY6tzpaICR4h41E79s76
nZKSeOxIpDZhQl06xNx2BsR4Kjhd6ynl0VhbgaqOGgfTuf+EyOt7MHi44uhfLc33Gi9P
5OeA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=9r5ReEDdVW9XZ/51iCZknwR32Yvyl1WkLrfCiNqHCSA=;
b=AeDscRgW6Y0OAy3isBdJkM7DTBs1SsYemxgeGKPf+ycrhptN0Kr+fW0UdfyIXnUCPp
2TgHHxjArlXy+sbfmRvgh5ZTjkzPBog2dFKudDb3cpkGJyMteSMYvq71Tq4QWxNIEXej
idSUlm/hduSMVyTyTqUQ8UlSBJyicO9Mj3juWa17u5BOavu78xSVecknlDodN12k4rkM
+mzUG1QUEFMZOn8KTryHCbzGBVT6C+KjKrJt/7ZH66q50D7yeW4gyN/c501zeEN8Dh3y
JjUKoocCLnfSOYV8r8HBg5pqLJHj5LaWvzZOuqc0pL7Jwz3Q9JU/KHTE42E6kmEXUUbB
aTZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FioBu7nR18goHGbbVTMyhazgpEKOUWKqJfb+53poZhCeJvFAbZ
sLzwIku2iIoS0vwKMIWRKItj/nJWpy1OiO/IKtM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsTKcDRXJSXBS2mrpbnLrzax1dh65FQ8q/DaGpHNVcUOgVKdUBokLW7M6Le9m6xxqEXufKqEQybmoBFOlQHrgw=
X-Received: by 10.176.95.217 with SMTP id g25mr7386170uaj.186.1521483015176;
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.57.111 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+nkc8DrHTVkbPJDEGksnoN3e-DQtKV1=owOA5pLAUWG+depzw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3D490CA8-0733-47AD-A088-113B1116B207@vpnc.org>
<CALZ3u+a9o1g0ZTkGjqWwfyV9phovEgu6Linp137yvM=JHSnj-A@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+nkc8DrHTVkbPJDEGksnoN3e-DQtKV1=owOA5pLAUWG+depzw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:09:54 +0000
Message-ID: <CALZ3u+bs+uDm16UiHp6fAF+EyrA9FBcbvYhRap76Wb6MCz_vOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/aLTPACyczwNCfMpqynizOKYf0Jc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>,
<mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
<mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:10:18 -0000
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> wrote: > In practice this is done by using either different DNS servers (or > processes), or multiple "views" in a DNS configuration. Another issue here is that, for some enterprises at least, there's no single "internal network" anymore. There are different network scopes (_sometimes_ nested) ranging from "formally internal but treated as almost external" to "air gap-separated DMZ", with different policies, including different DNS policies. My second thought (personally) is that there might be a reason to just bury the "split DNS" definition whatsoever and to just define a "multi-horizon DNS", where a "horizon" is defined by a company's policy and _usually_ depends on the source IP address of a query (there may be exceptions). | Artyom Gavrichenkov | gpg: 2deb 97b1 0a3c 151d b67f 1ee5 00e7 94bc 4d08 9191 | mailto: ximaera@gmail.com | fb: ximaera | telegram: xima_era | skype: xima_era | tel. no: +7 916 515 49 58
- [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Artyom Gavrichenkov
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Artyom Gavrichenkov
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Artyom Gavrichenkov
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Robert Edmonds
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Darcy Kevin (FCA)
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS John Kristoff
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS John Heidemann
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Michael Sinatra
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Steve Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Dick Franks
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Matt Larson
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Darcy Kevin (FCA)
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS Artyom Gavrichenkov