IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-06.txt

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Sat, 24 October 2015 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64C51B386E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87nASw2PXBiv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB8B1B386C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 7313E3BBA4; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 21:53:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 43933190B21; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 21:49:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 21:49:50 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20151024194950.GA7008@sources.org>
References: <20151019213107.9834.95181.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAF4+nEGEfL_hk-+K83WuFuVE5UZ0sDiJC7XYpxW0qZcDXuNz1w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEGEfL_hk-+K83WuFuVE5UZ0sDiJC7XYpxW0qZcDXuNz1w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 8.2
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/aTH9KrtRmDk3hgl0kg1bGz4yoZ4>
Cc: "<dnsop@ietf.org>" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-06.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 19:53:10 -0000

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 05:33:49PM -0400,
 Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 59 lines which said:

> This revision incorporated editorial improvements and improvements in
> explanatory and motivational text based on comments on the WG mailing
> list.

I've read it and diffed it and I believe it is OK. Section 5.2 is now,
IMO, much clearer and it addresses the problem reported in
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/QrrLtnCXhVI8usZsvAd5PU_b1Y4>,
thanks.

Editorial: "correct souce addresses" -> "correct source addresses",
"improves the probablity" -> "improves the probability". Also, "a
client MUST send client COOKIEs" is not a consistent casing of
cookie. It should be Client Cookies, to follow the convention of the
rest of the draft. Same thing for "a server MUST send server COOKIEs".

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status