IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-05.txt

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 29 September 2016 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B3912B52F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 05:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id merr59x2zI-X for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 05:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB6C212B548 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 05:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 5928631D6A; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:27:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 30839EC0B75; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:24:18 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:24:18 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Message-ID: <20160929122418.GA22645@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <147368142586.14471.16897934069436083953.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6ce7ea83-5ccc-aeda-d1e4-f5e5d1ccbf53@gnu.org> <CAHw9_iKtmVh8xvwVydWUs-g9t_JiKAF7Frdx_iieSEOvQFHJ1w@mail.gmail.com> <f33a6d06-2c17-04fd-d6a7-b73274705c37@gnu.org> <74610049-16f1-3210-7f79-8d38d596d641@bellis.me.uk> <05DF06B8-AB92-4DD9-B868-1D420FA33692@rfc1035.com> <CAHw9_iLGhDXsfPGNb0igLAdMHBbR+giFw067oEReD7Ww84Je-Q@mail.gmail.com> <8F7C438C-37EA-4C99-96D9-F4B59AFF40B7@rfc1035.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <8F7C438C-37EA-4C99-96D9-F4B59AFF40B7@rfc1035.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ahWtaKZ2d0MhURBgwgWvKZqHGE8>
Cc: IETF dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Moronic MUA Header Mangling <draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names@tools.ietf.org>, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:28:58 -0000

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 07:38:52PM +0100,
 Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote 
 a message of 35 lines which said:

> Where’s the demand from experimenters

The demand? You see it in the use of non-ICANN TLDs like .onion or
.bit.

> and why do they need a dedicated TLD for their alterate resolution
> systems?

You may think they don't NEED it but how will you convince them? (The
IETF has no police force, so our only course of action would be to
convince people.)

> FWIW I’m sceptical about creating .alt as a playpen for experiments
> since it might undermine efforts to answer the question ICANN asked
> us,

ICANN asked us what? When and where (URL, please)?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email