Re: [DNSOP] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: (with COMMENT)
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 12 May 2022 17:04 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF70C14F607; Thu, 12 May 2022 10:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ib8uyFUY23FP; Thu, 12 May 2022 10:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 078F8C1595FC; Thu, 12 May 2022 10:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.9]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 626AA2080A; Thu, 12 May 2022 10:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, tjw.ietf@gmail.com
References: <165226482674.16269.10057802528259757612@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 10:04:49 -0700
In-Reply-To: <165226482674.16269.10057802528259757612@ietfa.amsl.com> (Lars Eggert via Datatracker's message of "Wed, 11 May 2022 03:27:06 -0700")
Message-ID: <yblzgjmheby.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/an5UgP4nMakBB2QrmcdYAGUbFYg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 17:04:55 -0000
Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> writes: > DNS Error (EDE) {RFC8914} EDNS0 option of value (RFC EDITOR: TBD). > {RFC8914} looks like a Markdown citation bug. Yep. Fixed. > ### Stray characters > > The text version of this document contains these HTML entities, which might > indicate issues with its XML source: `č`, `Š`, and `Č` Actually it's the markdown source -- I'll get the names fixed though. > ### Grammar/style > > #### "Table of Contents", paragraph 1 > ``` > . . . . . . . . . . 10 Appendix D. Github Version of This Document . . . . . > ^^^^^^ > ``` > The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital > "H". Good point. Better yet though, I've added a note that the rfc editor should remove that section anyway. These are done (but more following): > #### Section 1.1, paragraph 1 > ``` > lag [RFC5155], which specifies whether or not that NSEC3 record provides pro > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > ``` > Consider shortening this phrase to just "whether". It is correct though if you > mean "regardless of whether". > > #### Section 2.3, paragraph 1 > ``` > w, ftp, mail, imap, login, database, etc) can be used to quickly reveal a lar > ^^^ > ``` > A period is needed after the abbreviation "etc.". > > #### Section 5, paragraph 1 > ``` > y Covering NSEC Records and DNSSEC On-line Signing", RFC 4470, DOI 10.17487/R > ^^^^^^^ > ``` > Do not mix variants of the same word ("on-line" and "online") within a single > text. I'm very confused now. That section looks nothing like you above text, nor is that text anywhere. And ditto with this one: > #### Section 7.1, paragraph 2 > ``` > NSSEC zone enumeration algorithm", n.d.. Appendix A. Deployment measurements > ^^ > ``` > Two consecutive dots. Were you perhaps reading a different reference or something? > #### "Appendix A.", paragraph 2 > ``` > Vixie * Tim Wicinski Appendix D. Github Version of This Document While this > ^^^^^^ > ``` > The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital > "H". I've marked that section to be deleted by the RFC Editor, but fixed that anyway. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
- [DNSOP] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Lars Eggert via Datatracker
- Re: [DNSOP] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-i… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-i… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-i… Lars Eggert