[DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8945 (7983)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 11 June 2024 13:00 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3B27C151710; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 06:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id 57EC0204E22; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 06:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240611130036.57EC0204E22@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 06:00:36 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: JQBLYORMXQIND2R3B4XXWIP4QMQIPMOL
X-Message-ID-Hash: JQBLYORMXQIND2R3B4XXWIP4QMQIPMOL
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: terts@nlnetlabs.nl, Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr, sa.morris8@gmail.com, paul@redbarn.org, d3e3e3@gmail.com, olafur+ietf@cloudflare.com, bwelling@akamai.com, dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8945 (7983)
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/aodDInvI1WwI_nW0WByViXHRSkY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8945, "Secret Key Transaction Authentication for DNS (TSIG)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7983 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Terts Diepraam <terts@nlnetlabs.nl> Section: 5.2 Original Text ------------- If the TSIG RR cannot be interpreted, the server MUST regard the message as corrupt and return a FORMERR to the server. Corrected Text -------------- If the TSIG RR cannot be interpreted, the server MUST regard the message as corrupt and return a FORMERR to the client. Notes ----- Server send an error to the client, not to itself. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8945 (draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2845bis-09) -------------------------------------- Title : Secret Key Transaction Authentication for DNS (TSIG) Publication Date : November 2020 Author(s) : F. Dupont, S. Morris, P. Vixie, D. Eastlake 3rd, O. Gudmundsson, B. Wellington Category : INTERNET STANDARD Source : Domain Name System Operations Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8945 (7983) RFC Errata System
- [DNSOP] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8945 (… Paul Vixie
- [DNSOP] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8945 (… Warren Kumari