Re: [DNSOP] New terminology for root name service
Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com> Thu, 06 April 2017 15:25 UTC
Return-Path: <matt@conundrum.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5536B129512 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4o5NSyZ87OWj for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x236.google.com (mail-vk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 074EE126CE8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id d188so44153675vka.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 08:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hmclpbL1EG2WXjPvDhwIPxqtETcYmI8ckbf/egaNQe0=; b=tTX4eJK5eD3XauwyM6x12njNX0NPOuiV5gh/aXdJeIjuCq1neaj2UxZEjYw6G9qCOk KWaCvxGabekcg+G3q/CKsOayucleGj/txqZKuf3/UjLztxvhv0xYU6WGGRppPgj8ukj9 Yy/4aXJYISUS82ufbW+Q3ncTQXtbRNyEl1+1fr3P33mmdenP9shHXEZoc6Tzqpf+mReE uWyIgYgPgfjHO4yK4Mbqpp7xUf4hAQM3ZaAhM7ODk1aN9FFFzoa6LB9mChey/K7bmYhH w0/fGiJ3JtijvG21ao3GqWrQ8jrTLRENh1JFCFqQkf1O4Es0gu90GFP5kWS0i1Sn2Jpt VbiA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hmclpbL1EG2WXjPvDhwIPxqtETcYmI8ckbf/egaNQe0=; b=VMI/u7vsPSTwjgRGH9CxYivVRUUsVxVD9voylCVmOLqo3dJjkfEXIj4VBoza/kwaj9 Tj16KJzQJ/oddyGrvqz+a6TdpDPQg7zFapKyk5xcUqC1bDkN21LD770ExqAycdrSSzha EMcBY2UJCl3XjxahfqvIGFED7Mr15XtZN+6RUxPnv5n2WNoJC5Yvj1qu6enmrMO5hS7c GPi6zXNjsKntLD47jH5ZB5hVS9ZQ4z1cc/rM668QZ+h1kgtMWNEOac2O+vbE+0szjdM2 atYxh1C5QeVGhfJltFBKKYTQpxi4v5hdrDvUwQCQ8jpaG2TAC7KUTLC0rdfNDYmIM7ni Y+pQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3Zl5CcnMANNSLXrQGSjAajk42qDl74saifAY+08mMiCXSUeRXjubWkFJjVlkdOTQkUzF4P9DGXQtixQQ==
X-Received: by 10.176.94.132 with SMTP id y4mr17899612uag.62.1491492336482; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 08:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.47.69 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CBB916EB-B0C7-4EE7-B23E-6BF097BF1FD1@vpnc.org>
References: <CBB916EB-B0C7-4EE7-B23E-6BF097BF1FD1@vpnc.org>
From: Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:25:36 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAiTEH_nqS--ixdBihH-_bJz-yh9DZorqU=wU64Qiaaq8=4B4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043c39cce6cf0d054c811e4d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/aw673MBH8lVjkK9pAVovG7aH57A>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New terminology for root name service
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 15:25:40 -0000
On 15 March 2017 at 13:31, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote: > Greetings again. RSSAC has published a lexicon of terms that are commonly > used with respect to the root of the public DNS, but are not in RFC 7719. I > have opened an issue for the terminology-bis document at > https://github.com/DNSOP/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/issues/17 and > would be intereted to hear what people think about including those terms in > our document. > > Hi Paul. Noting there hasn't been any actual feedback on your question ... I think the -bis document should at least reference RSAAC026, but I think importing those terms (particularly the ones that are not root-specific: instance, publish, serve) would be useful.
- [DNSOP] New terminology for root name service Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] New terminology for root name service william manning
- Re: [DNSOP] New terminology for root name service Wessels, Duane
- Re: [DNSOP] New terminology for root name service Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] New terminology for root name service Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] New terminology for root name service Dan York