Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimisation on the standards track?

Dan York <york@isoc.org> Wed, 18 July 2018 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <york@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA93130E31 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 07:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isoc.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJZNqOd_kSvy for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 07:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02on060f.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe46::60f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2F1A126F72 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 07:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isoc.org; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4bSo7Xra5dFhZRMfH0MN+iatoCxM/6G8ZJOfRhX2vBE=; b=UXcLRJYSJ5aTI99C5vpXcdYNJNlPGPrmFHSMe0/Bbk3WASk4JQK5jWJZkw2wMcq2zIA4MjRDL4SC8rScqhVxiHTFGByQcFRgYfXQEpKnP5EGt9GMyv4qz0Tr/C6zs4pEI3qGgoA/mUQtbS83T5QCvJCrhGzkl2eeRX7G57w9ewA=
Received: from DM6PR06MB3977.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (20.176.67.31) by DM6PR06MB3978.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (20.176.67.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.973.16; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:04:45 +0000
Received: from DM6PR06MB3977.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::21be:7c7c:4650:4416]) by DM6PR06MB3977.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::21be:7c7c:4650:4416%5]) with mapi id 15.20.0952.021; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:04:45 +0000
From: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
To: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
CC: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] QNAME minimisation on the standards track?
Thread-Index: AQHUHclGiBaT50ryKEOv+i6Qc2Tta6STpCqAgABMUQCAAQ9LgIAABTSA
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:04:44 +0000
Message-ID: <0117DA59-1EDB-4E5C-AAD9-2CFB7F5C3511@isoc.org>
References: <20180717121406.GA6681@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <0E1026DD-2304-43FE-BEED-B9CE2981D9E3@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1807171724540.3719@bofh.nohats.ca> <06C09D4F-CD08-41F9-AC6A-C7054F23E686@sinodun.com>
In-Reply-To: <06C09D4F-CD08-41F9-AC6A-C7054F23E686@sinodun.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=york@isoc.org;
x-originating-ip: [2001:67c:370:128:5c01:bccd:cb5b:e9c6]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM6PR06MB3978; 6:J0MUwrDQRW5fUFui7wM6S/cSWh8msOarq4VgDhIphd46c9NzWbFdmY9+OlNYU98uvpMgPDl0kcoHAT7ePoFjLdMEG6KX+tJj4tuGfboDzGGfgGA05ptiY0xWx2smurSv4MaG+ZIs3pQVOwq6lTKAhR8vuxOKCRvlYlMcFB0LTL6ZKGZjHy4PAXIP/q0Bcjp+joFigEHhtOubpwdTGSEOofmiMcWNHgvQT3vcrssC+OE11l2PurdC+UlOOhcWVUCNr12fzNN/Wwm/gjnPCNXLB+Runpz3ftxcbn8Qxi6/vRHMV0tCsWMR0UxVanuA0eLtex8r4VEdKln/JVuiH6Tm6EJ43l2viBczTJchS9PhPI/DXuT3OpNu3OeIVpTCDoSox/pkksxc6iEC8rI/lel2ipu0ij53DW98KV1bPjX6ykzxPmh+30zcM0fBDuAWD4eGeb0FoxH/6RVp1ec66uSkcQ==; 5:h4vUR13ry0BgG3jt3/0rGKMm1sQiVAUsWt3A0Mm6+O+dbGjGcuQGqr239o15B/Yjlv4dhnAsV5H+y21pKmWEvmulFnth/1ToIUVzEQoKA+aFPoU2ODVH77pm2Bxpku0DzOaOQCDyCqP1TgpIR+5O8Mc+iT25G8yah0ac/z7tDro=; 7:+DVY3bS9dChB/+jEoKjPIU356FzbKG8pxsAwHXZlvFz6oFnoLDk5S4C2ibAJz79zJlDfh23TD92OlMaP0R3CDWb36/Ex50lcfVJ0TwlCsg0geDYTCSvKRewKHDqGT+DHAkqZfhpPGCSoPpo6agwu1EjrevqWTcKY/csaeDz9lgvj54cxHP6f6fmiOfk+cOex/jGsZ/eZdvJC6vkkdNfk+FO7gl4UAx1H23pTCykUxFYPvRbjiPvHyvBbkF/4B/sc
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 88e3866c-c26e-46d6-1b3c-08d5ecb76a5e
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989117)(5600053)(711020)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990107)(2017052603328)(7153060)(49563074)(7193020); SRVR:DM6PR06MB3978;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR06MB3978:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR06MB3978F02EC26A6B9BB2FC925FB7530@DM6PR06MB3978.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(259379197776797);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(102415395)(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(3231311)(944501410)(52105095)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:DM6PR06MB3978; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM6PR06MB3978;
x-forefront-prvs: 0737B96801
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39840400004)(346002)(136003)(396003)(366004)(376002)(199004)(189003)(186003)(2900100001)(316002)(486006)(6116002)(476003)(2616005)(6486002)(229853002)(68736007)(446003)(11346002)(102836004)(8936002)(105586002)(256004)(76176011)(82746002)(5250100002)(99286004)(46003)(106356001)(33656002)(53546011)(25786009)(6506007)(4326008)(14444005)(5660300001)(99936001)(53936002)(7736002)(86362001)(93886005)(6246003)(6916009)(83716003)(97736004)(81156014)(54896002)(236005)(6512007)(6436002)(81166006)(8676002)(2906002)(478600001)(36756003)(14454004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR06MB3978; H:DM6PR06MB3977.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: isoc.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: WlWqdOVK2IQAVcO3HxThXg7fsyJIfGgQrrT5ug0Hy7ic6w3Y4/PZSA/caGz/O3zfRzbUiJsvzUE5NsZ9gfxBf2tX06qNySlP9tvPWfxE7hZrxVWIYP0CoXRfuUHJnpzNK0yykSQm9b/HX7VhqspmiMt1Hbz4ScqQETT/iHAOg2/X+kEiCoeld94LE7p1xDHYzj4qNU4wnDL2g83dIBcKb0UueA9LRfkILi3YubmNGIkDrnPGA2j9yChAU5YLi+qlyj5s9kc86SesFhZBDEc4LBlbh306wgK+RsepqLScUQKkT+t9lJuMWVUHxmS93xo6Ri2zbyyKSQl9HUfuNYHBvCyqNSJbhMZKyBtOS6W15o8=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E27DBD08-B8D8-4DC1-9B78-35EEA74F29CC"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 88e3866c-c26e-46d6-1b3c-08d5ecb76a5e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Jul 2018 14:04:44.9214 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 89f84dfb-7285-4810-bc4d-8b9b5794554f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR06MB3978
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/azXqxt5R9GhNdYx8t4NMDEg8gZY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimisation on the standards track?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:04:51 -0000

> On Jul 18, 2018, at 9:46 AM, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 17 Jul 2018, at 17:35, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, tjw ietf wrote:
>> 
>>> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimisation on the standards track?
>>> I’d like to see a more fleshed out operational considerations section.
<snip>
>> 
>> But I do believe qname minimisation is an important privacy enhancing
>> technology that we should strongly promote as a standards track
>> document.
> 
> +1
> 
> Sara.

+1. I think this is a valuable tool in our privacy toolbox and should be standardized.

Dan