Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-00.txt

[Paul Vixie <[e-mail]>]

Dave Lawrence wrote:
> Dave Lawrence writes:
>> The main changes, based on previous feedback, are:
>>
>> * Clarifying what the action is for Standards Track;
>> * Describing the algorithm previously proposed (and still included) as
>>    one example way of achieving the goals; and,
>> * Adding a rough proposal for an EDNS option that could be used for
>>    explicit signalling.
>>
>> That last item will be fleshed out more if there's demonstrated
>> interest from implementers in having such a thing.
>
> At the moment I'll observe there are no open issues against the draft,
> which is my comically passive-aggressive way of pointing out that it
> is obviously perfect and so let's just move it along to Last Call.

i apologize for my silence. there's been a lot going on in this WG.

>
> This is now your opportunity to correspondingly observe that someone
> is wrong on the Internet and to respond appropriately.  At the very
> least, we'd like to know whether there is sufficient support for
> pursuing the EDNS option or just to take it back out (and leave the
> rest of the obviously perfect document as-is).

this document must not proceed without explicit signaling, because this 
practice must not grow without explicit signaling.

>
> Thanks in advance for any feedback,

you're welcome in advance!

-- 
P Vixie