[DNSOP] AD Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 11 February 2019 21:17 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAC3124B0C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:17:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fdVKYM-ewzwf for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:17:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB5AE126C15 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:17:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id t27so364462wra.6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:17:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=10WjK271//Fdiqz6IF+5qjCdOB5VBSrlNyqmZVXggks=; b=Vr1phtnJGf0GmmF+3fCFf++HdVuOFH1UjqtdeztirwqY0XcYA2CszUWNCT8i51lVUn 6pXe9m8phqbTA2n74s9IT3aN1qx2wxX9CuKr6uQQ/5hE20C4I2IcTiquBNvLRutMTGrO 2Fp96ApOHjhl/eqIdtvez+an/GpL0AzUMw3NaDzPNRD4QAzY+DHUSUwueLceWJrp2vz6 LM7wLtmKV6kHJcux9pOMFur4Rz5MQfGRjC/pGykwpp6viNX4WbFwtUeOrskUoSXWUrwM uyjwG6GJ69UdI7WRJ7VVdUqGudOxMtXaezvvjSspXmCYFii3s6Fb8/kQ82QcLz8nYKIw Lt/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=10WjK271//Fdiqz6IF+5qjCdOB5VBSrlNyqmZVXggks=; b=imVlnodt2mI7/cF7cdEBSXvIew3NdBS8g+DZOPF+furHA7hTC1hPDjH6MtjbTs6iV6 s7+WI8VbzCLgJ1TODxg+q87F4T9BBVgpOkwIXFKxqMPdw+kMta/uCjUSsPnbdtN/Vf6C PyJwwlRpNEM24Xtgs2wVfUYJ5gsTxvt+hIf306NhTRjssrNWChfD2aHVy3GfSOjeALq6 2kVB+NqQ9jt0plZvNG1nhd1CoM9fo6d62Jy1Kv9iChdPnoAWPeEkBSQt5q63s64jcW2K tQBoJrQEJXTQaFLQ8FOEnfO3FdjDa3sMXqwHYgjLLugJfb+mYbWp4W6QNoFM+xcYrLUB cxQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAub4HVMzNHmlxMyL+BbWOlG6dT5I3y1DSLu3RhvAuJcMf76dnRl+ VOjPljpk0/tEYOmQsdCMcEHl1mFklI8yMMpGUbTP+5zolfM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZcOrL64hh6VPdGe9r3ew9mc9RA/TTFc71wKoMmizkhGhjGpdssFeRYkJb4aJi2y92cdBqgqDtflQ+ExRVVCR4=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:ba12:: with SMTP id o18mr189849wrg.326.1549919864214; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:17:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:17:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKB4rd3ZPCrjovJHzPdpQG2k7n3gaCkhpXzyanJhxj_Kw@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000efece60581a4d622"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/bA_GwSWcI-5uMCw_Qg0h-Zzq7e4>
Subject: [DNSOP] AD Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:17:48 -0000
Hi there,
Section 1.2. Updating Algorithm Requirement Levels says:
"[RFC2119] considers the term SHOULD equivalent to RECOMMENDED, and
SHOULD NOT equivalent to NOT RECOMMENDED. The authors of this
document have chosen to use the terms RECOMMENDED and NOT
RECOMMENDED, as this more clearly expresses the recommendations to
implementers."
Actually, RFC2119 doesn't really contain NOT RECOMMENDED --- but, RFC8174
("Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words"), which
updates RFC2119 *does*.
Can the authors please resubmit with the new boilerplate from RFC8174 in
Section 2 (Conventions Used in This Document) and I'll kick off IETF LC.
W
--
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
---maf
- [DNSOP] AD Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-u… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] AD Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-algorit… Paul Wouters