IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Priming query transport selection

Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk> Wed, 13 January 2010 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <alex@alex.org.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000973A68DA for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:36:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vGrbIxWhWeiv for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:36:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.avalus.com (mail.avalus.com [89.16.176.221]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6313A6842 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:36:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.40.215.19] (87-194-71-186.bethere.co.uk [87.194.71.186]) by mail.avalus.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A7B6C562AB; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:36:47 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:36:46 +0000
From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Message-ID: <5248F30769BA8EAB049B1568@nimrod.local>
In-Reply-To: <074C291445D8E2F871990FD2@nimrod.local>
References: <201001131823.o0DINxYv068180@stora.ogud.com> <555CFB98-BB21-4AD4-9D4A-3AF3BD98E4B2@rfc1035.com> <D9CCEA0D18D9D5B457A90853@Ximines.local> <631E7931-47D4-4AAF-B2C6-62DA6DA5A4CA@rfc1035.com> <CDE7E0414BC50C42E4FCC54F@Ximines.local> <E87EE584-97B5-4FE8-B47D-21048A702B51@rfc1035.com> <074C291445D8E2F871990FD2@nimrod.local>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Priming query transport selection
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:36:52 -0000

--On 13 January 2010 21:35:48 +0000 Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk> wrote:

> Sure, clients should as a general rule try getting UDP to work, but
> I think preventing them falling back to UDP unless they are prepared
                                          ^^^ - TCP
> to take the overhead of adding DO set is not right. It might have
> the perverse effect of encouraging people to set DO unnecessarily.



-- 
Alex Bligh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email