[DNSOP] Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-08: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 06 June 2023 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5B6C1522C8; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 10:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, swoolf@pir.org, swoolf@pir.org, tim@qacafe.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 10.5.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <168607380742.33018.5090991947220551124@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2023 10:50:07 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/bFucpYkIscX6aHDMW-03nMyvDzg>
Subject: [DNSOP] Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2023 17:50:07 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-08: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document. As a side note, I think it is
the first I-D that I read that uses the RFC 6761 'test.' ;-)

No specific comments but I wanted to thank two people in addition to the
authors.

Special thanks to Suzanne Woolf for the shepherd's detailed write-up including
the WG consensus and the justification of the intended status.

Other thanks to Tim Winters, the Internet directorate reviewer (at my request),
please consider this int-dir review:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-08-intdir-telechat-winters-2023-05-31/

Regards,

-éric