Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-01.txt
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Fri, 20 November 2020 18:29 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FDD3A0115 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:29:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DpNs9eTyeHw2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:29:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppa4.dc.icann.org (ppa4.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B1A63A1074 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:29:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.6]) by ppa4.dc.icann.org (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with ESMTPS id 0AKITiuc007211 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:29:44 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.659.4; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:29:43 -0800
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0659.008; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:29:43 -0800
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHWv2odA7jU+LjFNUq5unbq1SwQJKnR3YEA
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:29:43 +0000
Message-ID: <EE6E4F23-C5D1-4E82-AB38-9BB6543FF164@icann.org>
References: <160589648360.1612.14005425640806106383@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160589648360.1612.14005425640806106383@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_10B60CD1-6F81-465A-8BE1-8F7ED277F140"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-11-20_12:2020-11-20, 2020-11-20 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/bVOphlGNliX3ob_ZSRddJuKh3ys>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:29:53 -0000
Greetings again. Kazunori and I have now updated the -00 (which was a fairly close mirror of RFC 8499) with a few minor updates. If you look at the diff, you can see that they are: - While RFC 8499 was being developed, the WG went from the term "public DNS" to "global DNS". The authors of RFC 8499 made that change, but incompletely. This draft now makes that complete. - This draft encompasses all of the new terms from draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-ter. - We made the table in the discussion of "bailiwick" a real XML table so the result is much more readable in the HTML version of the eventual RFC. Adding new terms, changing the definition of current terms, and making corrections is possible, at the discretion of the WG chairs (not Kazunori and I). --Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-0… internet-drafts
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rf… Paul Hoffman