[DNSOP] Updates from Monday Meeting

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 28 March 2017 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF9F129A17 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mAr2sCuhrLSV for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22e.google.com (mail-wr0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0F02129A23 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id l43so114455571wre.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=87zbxJvEJoluH/6dUjklC/uzoO+ox6Kzr46OCshe/Tk=; b=Be570XwpoJnKXeF1iCCYFyATCuX4neOUDqMQ73aHgWrcj9T5hb9c02e6wzKMqBKFKW nAMBZAWKWozj/5lGvHbYlT1lw4/02gjx/ihkgoY4m6OQscE1LMmQuGYaxwIHxIze95p4 0SC6HPfiQb2Si4fEueCM9TWnsjmhrcY2NnTP1VRCTuFcbxwuApGPZHxiZoWiSHdbrGZl pD8fIvg5bg692GN3EdGo7kVqmRnewT9ckIsCmG82d7zzJFqH3pLTB8xHEwIRBiPHdEln VsZtdP6H3yXOELjFHHPiLIuCWCB12nYS/ioBEHek7CtUs4kV2T8MeB2jrGOt0X3Upz+c kxkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=87zbxJvEJoluH/6dUjklC/uzoO+ox6Kzr46OCshe/Tk=; b=PosvF0dcQo3XU772QxmcsaG0n6wnffXTHOjumuMiCIZjGIeg3xsGD545TGMlKEOXPe ZthlyGwv9/6on9LLgxK9U6JyC6fB6saa13kih8vFAvXX2S6hS/6lAsYoaOZ2ZiU6AJ5x AfhdKB3v8RSRSqhK7wwuvpHNPB5ij5EeznhSnQzdI8GM99WNNvO2ZpWYN45paOi6EBcl YvxMZEOQFWx+OAOmsEMiB/Z0aXvSepsvs5DufP3x0MV0azcVrsPmMMSTSmldPEfHOkr+ 6hsZllMOyBf/hoN3DRUTngyjXW4X1oD2yHK2Gwf6o+/5t783D1BP6TY2ltFDnf+G2RAX BezQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3zhrudJGUBKhMQm2upU2xuVFuJhSXXVu6sZ5X2vyBhlSCWFoUfNwuF6eQ15DXd1/Hv1OudZR6wBdXgQw==
X-Received: by 10.223.166.46 with SMTP id k43mr15575772wrc.64.1490733791037; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.165.70 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:43:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+EQKcPaRojZh2TGMxdO5jYQ1-jYkMQ0-k=eRotz-JJTXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045cf0b211d3b9054bd082ef
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/bbqVJEr6oySGmzDyjOXafoIoUps>
Subject: [DNSOP] Updates from Monday Meeting
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:43:18 -0000

All

We know we ran out of time, which is a regular problem for us.  A
combination of being too optimistic in our scheduling and too many people
with interesting things to discuss.   In the past we've tried to ask for
multiple sessions,  but with the pressure on slots we've always backed
down.  We feel in Prague we're going to try for two slots, even if one is
an hour that we can talk about new work (for example)

But I don't want people to skip these presentations we've uploaded.

David Lawrence has two drafts (which he has mentioned since the meeting):

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tale-dnsop-serve-stale
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tale-dnsop-edns0-clientid/

slides:

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/slides/slides-98-dnsop-stale-server-and-extended-error-code-00.pdf

Warren and Wes have a draft on extended error codes that this operator
(not wearing any hats) finds completely interesting and would like to see
more of:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-dnsop-extended-error/

slides:

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/slides/slides-98-dnsop-dns-extended-error-codes-00.pdf

Ondrej is looking for feedback on adding new algorithsm to nsec3:

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/slides/slides-98-dnsop-adding-new-algorithms-to-nsec3-00.pdf

Thanks again for a productive meeting.  We'll take to the mailing list any
votes, etc.

tim