Re: [DNSOP] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-08

[Shumon Huque <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 3:21 PM Gonzalo Salgueiro via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Reviewer: Gonzalo Salgueiro
> Review result: Ready
>
[...]

> Two very minor nits that you might optionally consider:
>
> — Abstract —
>
> I'm not sure it is grammatically incorrect but the following sounds
> better to me:
>
> OLD
>         Glue records are expected to be returned as part of a referral and
>         if they cannot be fitted into the UDP response, TC=1 MUST be set to
>         inform the client that the response is incomplete and that TCP
> SHOULD be
>         used to retrieve the full response.
>
> NEW
>         Glue records are expected to be returned as part of a referral and
>         if they cannot be fit into the UDP response, TC=1 MUST be set to
> inform
>         the client that the response is incomplete and that TCP SHOULD be
> used
>         to retrieve the full response.
> END
>

Thanks for the review.

"if they cannot be fit into the UDP response" is not grammatically correct.

My suggestion would be to use more plain language like "if they do not fit
into the UDP response".


> I found myself looking up a few terms, so it might be useful to include
> a reference to RFC 8499 (or draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis) for the
> uninitiated.
>

Puneet Sood has also previously made this suggestion on the working group
list, and we agree. We'll add it in the next revision.

Shumon