Return-Path: <shuque@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D635B3A0404;
 Thu, 21 May 2020 09:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
 header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 50Hdqo3rJgvA; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B7923A053E;
 Thu, 21 May 2020 09:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id a2so9444817ejb.10;
 Thu, 21 May 2020 09:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; 
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=gpg2TG/hvZmLbs6ESI6EGOcOKqma07uPenvqmSMsqVs=;
 b=NhKRDBaZsNV0e8EXGWML5q3ZZjuxNIIjf4ClHbKaGhSPf+9ACjn3eb7VRa2GV0CRJb
 p1E//7QVY4xbFktWdhXl/4aHvQDdFDAfaWsVV6s+GrsxL3sDp8bqAYAylVyKuNuRy3Ty
 E35UmAp8lxJFSbmItz5ACdTLr+/pXddzegnCoIyMuL0y/7ELR/G9+/7vYNP6UdHBJoZW
 oZnV2Qu2Bh9Uxccmd8q6s2udf1mgbIY7wH6B0q7FpO9U3O2mfPjE1+seEvsY8Klzp/rW
 Zr1vZNver1GfQyTAA+iwvK25Lnt/DGgXZsq0UTXuq7uNmnKym9VyDx7nHmajI2j0X3UA
 EwDw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=gpg2TG/hvZmLbs6ESI6EGOcOKqma07uPenvqmSMsqVs=;
 b=ag4m1Oi8wmKcCZulrzA40ObXHqU9ZE9P0gkoCdFpm2iy3dwbU00VBTz35HKl6zr4px
 A9BAC6I1x1gRNZ2Cj2aWJpN42eAsfcZmtBVRYmd7fH4tg0weAj7EjFJDqC5qsxBG9sXt
 LrlZHVBUK38as3hPl0/PwayH26yEw0OGU3tV2aGX6hgDrZtdUSOu/nb32QBwjF0oIuFB
 R+ASPx+wybzXjA3hsyZ3qJycHrQxPvx6VxyOxanLkVInre2EcEmU3qz5D7S+gpKsl0Hj
 P8GGz2MDkgygBU8uduprJBu84q+y6wHxLZqntseXXRpJ5xH3vtJ/EeCLbtoSW1Vgnzbm
 4CNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530tYi5skBQFzFP3CBFD1DUh5nkeGbcV1fQ0/mY7y4AaHw40Hoay
 I7jfteXQOZtjSX/tqGqepO2fsd8jAqXquDSSf2rYIw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwGG+afYDlyyttDQucr4JhVsD8h8dPDoFC4PPpHb+7uO+9tAyGgWfzJh4BibJYKknYuYnyAauxYyxb9pKY3u9Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:57d6:: with SMTP id
 u22mr4231033ejr.49.1590077404644; 
 Thu, 21 May 2020 09:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+Ee0qXCVA+xarfaWc-BnDmBPHkvRx2dTOKOr_kU_1MNRA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+Ee0qXCVA+xarfaWc-BnDmBPHkvRx2dTOKOr_kU_1MNRA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 12:09:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHPuVdWSacwwfjb5+seM8Rb5-LYn7SmMEC53MKsdthmGgqWGMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000de8a4005a62abecb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/bmUoXmxvfaO6FjItxhZJbSLlD_s>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption:
 draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>,
 <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
 <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 16:10:10 -0000

--000000000000de8a4005a62abecb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 1:50 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to run
> regular call for adoptions over next few months.
> We are looking for *explicit* support for adoption.
>
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for
> draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional
>
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional/
>
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
> by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>
> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
>
> This call for adoption ends: 1 June 2020
>

I've read the draft. It's a useful clarification to the spec, so I support
adoption and will review etc.

I have one question for the Mark A though:

Since you specifically cite the example of the GOV servers, did you ask
Verisign about this behavior, and if so, what was their response? Maybe
this is just a bug, rather than a "widespread misbelief" about additional
data & truncation that you more generally attribute as the cause for this.

Shumon

--000000000000de8a4005a62abecb
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 1:50 PM Tim Wicin=
ski &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:tjw.ietf@gmail.com">tjw.ietf@gmail.com</a>&gt; wr=
ote:</div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl=
e=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);paddin=
g-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div style=3D"font-family:monospace">All,<br><=
br>As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we&#39;re going t=
o run<br>regular call for adoptions over next few months. =C2=A0<br>We are =
looking for *explicit* support for adoption.<br><br><br>This starts a Call =
for Adoption for draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional<br><br>The draft =
is available here: <a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-andrew=
s-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional/" target=3D"_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.o=
rg/doc/draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional/</a><br><br>Please review t=
his draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption<br>by DNSOP, and =
comments to the list, clearly stating your view.<br><br>Please also indicat=
e if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.<br><br>This call for =
adoption ends: 1 June 2020</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I&#3=
9;ve read the draft. It&#39;s a useful clarification to the spec, so I supp=
ort adoption and will review etc.</div><div><br></div><div>I have one quest=
ion for the Mark A though:</div><div><br></div><div>Since you specifically =
cite the example of the GOV servers, did you ask Verisign about this behavi=
or, and if so, what was their response? Maybe this is just a bug, rather th=
an a &quot;widespread misbelief&quot; about additional data &amp; truncatio=
n that you more generally attribute as the cause for this.</div><div><br></=
div><div>Shumon</div><div><br></div></div></div>

--000000000000de8a4005a62abecb--

