IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 16 July 2009 08:01 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD353A67EA for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.337
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.337 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.912, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XT5XBYAmZ4Yq for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (mx2.nic.fr [192.134.4.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB243A6774 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 65BC51C0112; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:21:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613581C0110; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:21:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2D3A1D9E2; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:21:54 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:22:56 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <20090716072256.GB5985@nic.fr>
References: <C680B730.EB2C%Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.0907131506280.30197@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0907131347330.8917@newtla.xelerance.com> <p06240806c681347afdd5@[10.20.30.158]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <p06240806c681347afdd5@[10.20.30.158]>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 5.0.2
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-livingood-dns-redirect-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:01:53 -0000

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:01:51PM -0700,
 Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote 
 a message of 17 lines which said:

> Some of the services defined in the draft are highly desired by some
> Internet users.

I did not hear them so this sort of users is obviously not in the
dnsop WG :-) More seriously, noone mentioned here any survey about
this. So, we can just guess and speculate.

If there is really a demand of some users, I have no problem with a
opt-in service, honestly explained to the users ("We will modify
legitimate DNS responses to blacklist some domains, to redirect you to
other sites, if you agree, click here").

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email