Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-rpz

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 19 July 2017 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079A4131BC2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ooOAtu7lrPpM for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (www.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68DDC131BC1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 14835 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2017 22:01:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 19 Jul 2017 22:01:53 -0000
Date: 19 Jul 2017 22:01:31 -0000
Message-ID: <20170719220131.2283.qmail@ary.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4B2B2D27-7E24-41BC-93B7-D33FAF783BD6@vpnc.org>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/bqfSSudRu0Dq6ZBpbFO7q-cgwaI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-rpz
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:01:56 -0000

In article <4B2B2D27-7E24-41BC-93B7-D33FAF783BD6@vpnc.org> you write:
>If the WG still gets to freely edit the document while adhering to 
>"describes an existing and widely deployed method", this seems like a 
>good way forwards.

Text can change, bits can't.  OK with me.

R's,
John