IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-muks-dnsop-dnssec-sha3-01

Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org> Mon, 10 April 2017 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <muks@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6266E1294F0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 08:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1F7q_iey1c4q for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 08:09:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.banu.com (mail.banu.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:644b::225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E6E1275C5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 08:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jurassic (unknown [115.117.162.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.banu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08A1A56A0035; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:09:20 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 20:39:18 +0530
From: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org>
To: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170410150917.GA22210@jurassic>
References: <20170410093847.GA21654@jurassic> <CA+nkc8AebVmM46FQ3hzcz9OkNEMvBu6EcSHF-L=hp9qobS8UHQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+nkc8AebVmM46FQ3hzcz9OkNEMvBu6EcSHF-L=hp9qobS8UHQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/buiw8GfoXN00j1mJ0-UVS5S4d9U>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-muks-dnsop-dnssec-sha3-01
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:09:24 -0000

Hi Bob

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:44:51AM -0400, Bob Harold wrote:
> Looking at the diff
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-muks-dnsop-dnssec-sha3-01
> is difficult because some of the DNSSEC example lines are not wrapped.
> I don't know if that can be fixed.

We kind of restarted the draft adopting RSASSA-PSS, so please can you
review it this time from scratch without looking at the diff?

Many of the examples will need updating once algorithm numbers are
assigned for them (as for some calculations, the algorithm number is an
input), so we didn't spend time on wrapping the long lines in this
revision.

		Mukund

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email