Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-fanf-dnsop-rfc2317bis

[Tony Finch <[e-mail]>]

神明達哉 <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> - I wonder why its intended status is standards track.  It generally
>   just talks about operational techniques rather than describe some
>   new protocol, so a BCP seems to be more appropriate (in fact RFC2317
>   is a BCP).  Perhaps it's because this document will "update" RFC2136?
>   I'm not necessarily opposed to it, but just curious.

Yes, it's because of the changes to UPDATE. (See the questions for
reviewers in the appendices)

> - Section 7.5: s/will be still be/will still be/

Thanks :-)

> - Section 8
>
>    Similarly, for its IPv6 network 2001:db8:A::/48, organization A again
>    asks for a DNAME record, like this:
>
>   I'm not sure why 'a' in '2001:db8:A::' is upper-cased, but if
>   there's not a strong reason for it I'd consider lower-casing it,
>   applying the recommendation of RFC5952 (whose primary target is not
>   literature like I-Ds or RFCs, but I think it's generally better to
>   have consistent view in various textual representations of IPv6
>   addresses).

I have used "2001:db8:A::" for the same reason I used "A.example". Is it
too cute?

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <[e-mail]>  http://dotat.at/
Southeast Iceland: Northerly 5 to 7, increasing gale 8, perhaps severe gale 9
later. Moderate or rough, becoming very rough later. Snow or snow showers.
Moderate occasionally very poor.