IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-04

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sat, 05 December 2020 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F202E3A09E1; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 09:32:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HA-jZAKoilSs; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 09:32:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBB853A09E0; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 09:32:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 0B5HOASM008630; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 17:32:38 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=RWEy4L2U5KEiJt0WKoZSbxmCkpNk20x4TfihnLtQcIc=; b=h6EkEth6y1My7Z43DPkMRTZlr9J7Whv4KWRFg0sK+9MD3kAr+7fD9uksrBHaMBI8W7I0 13mhlwnj4J3qfI9F0AAvPm/RPywqFv9nlz9MLLxO5QnaFKq2vQhPcdFTuJ0znFUsQAbL cKp2Ee0EnOTCLjc39Rm4paaj4wOHn+2BFz/EMcIEQ0uu4k0W0Jcq523VKeadOIBDWJ0e Av8ev9J8+aVdmF54a7c3f8APGs8Q3iCRW44dCZTJQIz/SRoB6Ok3RUNDhqEwtVdwIfVY o6jb0B7dquMkVpIPLx6xAVeO0kphYsde2rO3Kz51vHuRYBC0FVZjllXpgVtxK8tTKDW9 pQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3583q5rhnu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:32:38 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0B5HJkON001487; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 09:32:37 -0800
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 35892eghbs-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 05 Dec 2020 09:32:36 -0800
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) by usma1ex-dag3mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 12:32:36 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 12:32:36 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.008; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 12:32:35 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Ondřej Surý <ondrej@isc.org>
CC: "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies.all@ietf.org>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-04
Thread-Index: AQHWyNM3WzeTZavIY0a2VdBQji4irqnkc1MAgAAvdYCAABGCgIADCDGAgADfwgCAAGp0gP//wLOA
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:32:35 +0000
Message-ID: <4DDA1831-7F6E-45C2-809E-F88CB9D599F3@akamai.com>
References: <160693121881.9413.5642470305677631145@ietfa.amsl.com> <17AFD6F5-11DA-41BC-8C37-E1893648041D@isc.org> <CABcZeBPRn3aTBsApawvk_Ecyzdbi+SX9=b74y0_uhYx_Y8p-5w@mail.gmail.com> <51A61472-45D7-4133-80BC-1F470B5CBD84@isc.org> <20201204203635.GS64351@kduck.mit.edu> <320692C5-9C47-4CE6-8D6C-A62C2B50728F@akamai.com> <d827684d-3d60-6f30-cfdb-e598025b32e3@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <d827684d-3d60-6f30-cfdb-e598025b32e3@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.43.20110804
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <7B3A59ABB10C1048A6B6D59668615A10@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-12-05_13:2020-12-04, 2020-12-05 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=823 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012050116
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-12-05_13:2020-12-04, 2020-12-05 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=730 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012050117
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 184.51.33.60) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint5
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/bwGLjjss6Q5qOqM2m5jpxGfVPe0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-04
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:32:45 -0000

>    FWIW, I think asking CFRG for comment (not approval) whenever
    a new algorithm is introduced onto the standards-track is a
    good idea, regardless of the WG from which the draft came.
    Such checks don't mean anyone thinks badly of any algorithm,
    the argument is it's better to ask a question in the place
    where the expertise lies, just in case.

I don't disagree, but I CFRG should be asked if they are willing, and if they are, then such a change needs to be socialized.  I am not sure it's fair to hold this draft up.  I mean, it's not like it uses ROT-13.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email